Imidacloprid |
Edward
Frank |
Jan
30, 2007 17:09 PST |
Hello,
I looked over the selection of bug killers at Wal-mart today.
Only two
products from Bayer had imidacloprid in them.
Bayer Advanced Garden Tree and Shrub Insect Control is a 32 oz
bottle
that contains 1.47% imidacloprid. It is meant to be diluted and
poured
around the base of the tree with a sprinkling can. The bottle is
$18.28
I am wondering if this type of application would be effective,
and what
the dilution ration should ideally be? I
understand it would be more
expensive than the generic chemical.
One thing I am wondering about is the tendency of imidacloprid
to bond
with humus under hemlock trees. Could you dig through the humus
layer
into the substrate and apply it there instead?
You have mentioned generic imidacloprid powder under the names
ZENITH 75
WSP INSECTICIDE, TOUCHSTONE 75 WSP INSECTICIDE, Quali-Pro
Imidacloprid
75WSB, etc. Are there limits to who may sell these products or
purchase
them?
Ed Frank |
RE:
Imidacloprid |
Will
Blozan |
Jan
30, 2007 18:00 PST |
Ed,
I have heard of good to excellent results from Bayer Tree and
Shrub Insect
Control. The dosage is the equivalent of the highest dosage that
can be
applied via the powdered version that I use in my business. It
is expensive,
with one bottle treating only a 10" diameter tree. This
equates to ~$1.90
per diameter inch (with tax) versus ~ $.80 per inch for the
other products
you mentioned. The biggest complaint I have heard is the
extraordinary
amount of water they recommend mixing the solution in. I don't
quite see the
need for so much water but then again, I don't use the product
myself.
In NC, anyone can buy the other products, which are a powder, at
an
agricultural insecticide dealer. As long as you are not applying
the product
for profit you can buy and apply without a pesticide
applicator's license.
The studies I have read indicate that hemlock roots are very
shallow and
will exploit the upper layers of organic material so a topical
or shallow
application is best. I have seen 4.5 years+ control of HWA from
one soil
drench application of imidacloprid at the median rate on the
label.
Obviously there was no need to apply below the surface, although
all my
applications now are just below the surface in the organic layer
under the
loose duff.
Will
|
RE:
Imidacloprid |
Doug
Bidlack |
Jan
30, 2007 22:29 PST |
Ed and Will,
I think the Bayer product is what my mom is using on her White
Ash
'Autumn Purple' and Black Locust 'Purple Robe' for emerald ash
borers
and locust borers. The white ash was never touched, so I can't
say much
except that the tree is still alive in a sea of dead ashes. The
black
locust was ravaged the first year after we planted it, but it
hasn't
been touched since treatment (three years now).
Doug
|
RE:
Imidacloprid |
Brandon
Gallagher |
Jan
31, 2007 05:51 PST |
If you are interested in purchasing imidacloprid for HWA you can
contact
me at one of the numbers below. Our company has a product,
Xytect, in
both a 75WSP and 2F (liquid) formulation that is imidacloprid
marketed
specifically at the tree care market. The largest tree care
companies in
the country are using it exclusively and the USFS and several
state FS
are using it this year. As Will said, we can sell both
formulations to
private citizens as end users, however if you are going to offer
treatments as a service you will need a license. Later this
spring we
will carry a Xytect Infusible which is a injectible formulation
that is
applied through our new refillable M3 infuser. Check out
www.xytect.com
for more.
Brandon Gallagher Watson
Technical Support
ISA Certified Arborist MN-4086A
Rainbow Treecare Scientific Advancements
2239 Edgewood Ave S
Minneapolis, MN 55426
1-877-ARBORIST
|
Re:
Imidacloprid |
Edward
Frank |
Jan
31, 2007 17:47 PST |
Will and Brandon,
Thank you for your replies. I was curious about this particular
product.
The HWA is not here yet, although it may arrive later this
summer or next
year. At that time I will likely be buying stuff to treat a
dozen plus
trees or so in our small lot.
Ed Frank
|
Re:
Imidacloprid |
John
A. Keslick, Jr. |
Feb
01, 2007 03:30 PST |
Are we killing the good guys as well as the bad guys? For an
example: Less
than 1% of the insects and fungi are harmful to humans. Think
about that
when you use a product that kills everything. Trees have many
associates
that address their quality of life.
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Beware of so-called TREE EXPERTS who do not understand TREE
BIOLOGY!
www.treedictionary.com
http://mercury.ccil.org/~treeman/
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep
reminding us
that we are not the boss.
Some people will buy products they do not understand and not buy
books that
will give them understanding.
|
Re:
Imidacloprid ,John |
wad-@comcast.net |
Feb
01, 2007 05:52 PST |
John
I don't think your way of thinking is crazy, just different.
Imidacloprid kills insects that feed on the plants that are
treated. It is not a contact insecticide. It is much more
friendly to the earth than systemic insecticides of the past. It
has a long residual so repeated applications aren't necessary. I
treated a copper beech in 2001 for wooly aphids. The population
had definitely breeched the threshold, as the honeydew sounded
like rain falling from the tree. With one application of
Imicloprid into the soil (no non targets were affected by air)
it cleared the problem up and they haven't been back. Oils and
other contacts do kill everything. Using IPM methods, this seems
to be the best choice. Imicloprid does not have fungicidal
properties to my knowledge.
Scott |
Re:
Imidacloprid |
Jess
Riddle |
Feb
02, 2007 16:39 PST |
John,
Killing not-target organisms is certainly unfortunately and to
be
avoided where possible. However, we need to evaluate our options
against alternatives rather than against currently impossible
ideals.
Yes, imidacloprid will kill organisms that feed on hemlocks in
addition to the adelgid, and if applied to the soil, some soil
organisms in a localized area. What if we don't treat the
hemlocks?
The hemlocks will die and the organisms that feed exclusively on
them
will have no food. The soil will be disturbed over a much
broader
area; in some ways less intensively and in other ways more
intensively. If we had some way to attack the adelgids and only
the
adelgids that would be wonderful. The beetles are currently the
leading hope for that solution, but we haven't yet figured out
how to
get them to reduce adelgid populations to trivial levels.
Jess
|
RE:
Hemlock and Adelgid Survey |
James
Smith |
Feb
02, 2007 17:10 PST |
It
seems obvious even to a layman such as myself that the only
effective
way to buy time is to use the most effective adelgicide in as
wide an
area as is possible. Yes, some organisms will suffer in the
short-term,
but the long-term effects of the extinction of the eastern and
carolina
hemlock species equals the extinctions of those organisms that
are tied
exclusively to those trees.
I think of our hemlocks every day. Every single day. It sickens
and
depresses me to think that these trees, among which I have hiked
all of
my life, will soon become extinct.
If it were possible to treat vast areas of hemlocks forests with
the
effective adelgicide, what are the long-term odds of the eastern
and
carolina hemlocks surviving an extinction event? |
|