Tuliptree Growth Question Jennifer Dudley
July 12, 2009

ENTS,

So many grand tulip trees in the northeast (and probably elsewhere). I
know that this is an early succession species and that it is a
relatively fast grower (would you compare it to the growth rate of an
eastern white pine?), but it couldn't have germinated in all those
places on its own could it? Seems that it would be a great tree to
plant for reforestation of parks/non-timber land, so it would have
been actively planted as well. And from what I've observed, once they
are established they seem to propagate pretty well.

Jenny


Will Fell (July 12, 2009) wrote:

Jenny

I really couldn't speak in comparison with the E. White Pine, but
Yellow Poplar is a relatively fast growing hardwood. I would compare
it's growth rate down here in SE GA favorably with Loblolly Pine. The
difference being, at least here in the south, that Yellow Poplar is
very site specific (as many hardwoods are). Yet that site varies by
region. Up in the mountains and upper piedmont of GA the tree is found
generally in rich northfacing coves. Down in south GA it is found in
what we refer to as poplarheads. These are springheads that are
generally wet year round, but not at the bottom of the drainage where
water stands. Not sure how to describe it if you are not familiar with
the term springhead other than to say they grow on a slight slope at
the head of branches, where the water doesn't puddle yet you are going
to get your tennis shoes muddy walking through it. Generally the soils
are a little better in these poplarheads than in areas of deep sandier
soils where the same hydrological regime would result in highly acidic
bayheads where Bay trees would replace the poplars.

As for their reproduction, poplars fill a niche where other trees
don't thrive. The other thing about poplar trees is they are prolific
seeders. If you select cut poplar, red maple or tupelo will dominate,
but if you clearcut and the seeds get some light, because the seeds
will remain viable for many years in the duff, poplar reproduction
will predominate. As they are a relatively valuable hardwood timber
tree down here (peeler logs) we recommend clearcutting or patch
cutting if it is a good poplar site and there are even just few poplar
trees around you will be rewarded with good poplar regeneration.
Another problem with select cutting, besides the risk of high grading,
is that the boggy sites they thrive on will generally be damaged by
the equipment and result in disease and degrade on the remaining
poplar trees. I would suspect this would not be as much an issue in
the mountains or piedmont.


Bob Leverett (July 13, 2009) wrote:

Jenny,

      With respect to your question about tulip trees  (also called tuliptree , tulip poplar , yellow poplar, and canoe wood ) compared to white pines, I'll present some insights based on general observations and a heck of a lot of tree measurements. I'll leave a more precise explanation of the growth requirements to silviculturists and foresters who have experience with the species, except to say that pines do best in silt-sandy soils and tuliptrees do best in rich soils. So they don't always inhabit the same locations, although many sites in the Northeast might have both, with one better suited to a particular site.  
       In terms of rapid growth, they are good competitors. The white pine is our tallest native eastern tree species and the tulip poplar is our second, i.e.  t hey aren't just fast growers, but reach greater absolute heights than any other eastern species. Both species have been measured to over 180 feet (ENTS measurements) in the East. Our tallest white pine, the Boogerman Pine  in the Smokies is almost 189 feet in height and our tallest tulip poplar, also in the Smokies,  is almost 182 feet. But despite t he slight  height advantage of the white pine, t ulip trees reach much greater sizes than white pines. I won't inundate you with numbers, but the ratio of maximum tulip tree volume to maximum white pine volume is between 3 and  4 to 1.
        T his general information  about volumes cannot be applied across the geographical range of t he species. In central New England, the white pine will out compete the tulip poplar. In northern New England, forget it. The tulip trees is beyond its range limits. It will grow in people's yards, but is not a forest competitor. So Maine is not tulip tree country.
         Farther south, (southern New Jersey, Pennsylvania, etc.) the tulip tree comes into its own. I n places like the coves of the southern Appalachians of North and South Carolina, Tennessee, and northern Georgia, it  reseeds old fields that are  left to return to forest. Coves can be dominated by this single species.
        G oing westward, the role of tulip tree is less clear to me and in the central Mid-west, the white pine is out of its element. However, in the northern Mid-west, the species reaches its greatest historical abundance. While its range overlaps that of the tulip tree, I don't know how well they compete with one another. Maybe Lee Frelich can shed some light on the subject. However, I suspect they occupy different habitats.   
        On my just ended trip west, I encountered the tulip tree in Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio in 3 of the 4 old growth stands I visited in those states. If I add in a site from last year, I saw tulip tree o n 4 of 5 old growth sites. In Beall Woods, Illinois, the tulip tree was the tallest species growing among the two dozen or so species I saw. At 141.5 feet tall, t he Beth Koebel Tulip Tree is Beall Woods's tallest tree. In Pioneer Mothers Memorial Forest and Nature Preserve in southern Indiana, the tulip tree is the tallest species, except for a lone sycamore. Tulips there get into the low 130s. In Davey Woods of southwestern Ohio, the tulip tree is lord of the forest. I measuredthem to 144.5 feet and probably didn't get the top of the tree. Several are in the 135 to 145-foot height class. There are no white pines in those forests. It isn't white pine country.
     Here in western Mass, tulips occup rich sunny sites and reach to almost 140 feet. White pines are widely distributed and reach to 169 feet with room left for a few to push 170 feet. The pines reach greater girths and volumes when in stands. Tulips in mixed stands tend to be slender.  I expect that in colonial times, with more open land, there were a few more of them, but Massachusetts is definitely the transition zone for the species.
     In adjacent New York, tulips make it up the Hudson River Valley and eastward to the foothills of the Taconics. They peter out near the south end of Lake Champlain. They will not compete with the great whites at that latitude. However, in the lower Hudson River Valley, tulip trees can reach great size. We've measured several to over 150 feet in height and between 11 and 14 feet in girth on the old Vanderbilt Estate in Hyde Park. There are younger tulips on Roosevelts estate, but they're nothing special.
     Near Syracuse is a place called Green Lake State Park. It has a stand of tulip trees, the explanation for which, I do not have. They reach to 144 feet, but have crowns that look weather beaten. My guess is that the climate does not favor the species in terms of growing them as a timber crop although their fast growth rates allows them to be the tallest hardwood in the area.
     West Virginia is a p lace that grows huge tulip trees and also grows nice white pine. In the Mountaineer State. the tulips will easily outgrow white pines. Oops, better consult with Russ Richardson on that. Russ?
    Well where does all this rambling lead in terms of the questions you posed? In southern New England, tulips are an alterntive to white pine for the right kinds of soils. At the latitude of central Massachusetts, the advantage has shifted to the white pine. Farther north, the t ulips are out except as ornamentals.
     My friend Professor Gary Beluzo may have some observations to make of his own. Gary?

Bob   


Jess Riddle (July 17, 2009) wrote:

Jenny,

In general, tuliptree and white pine are comparable in growth rate.
That same topic came up a couple of years ago, and I posted my
thoughts here:

http://www.nativetreesociety.org/species/sp_threads/tuliptree_vs_white_pine_growth.htm 

As far as whether tuliptree is regenerating on its own, I'm not quite
sure what you mean by "in all those places".  I see tuliptree as being
less site specific than what Will described, although I'm sure his
comments are a good description of tuliptree in the Atlantic Coastal
Plain.  In the southeastern piedmont and southern Appalachians,
tuliptree is widespread on moist sites and often forms nearly pure
stands on formerly farmed areas.

For old-growth near New York City, Minnewaska State Park and Mianus
Gorge Preserve might be places to check.  Others more familiar with
the area will probably have better suggestions.

Jess

 

 

Continued at:

http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees/browse_thread/thread/c9e42cf7a88a16bb?hl=en