Native
Plant Communities Definition |
Steve
Galehouse |
Jan
08, 2007 04:20 PST |
Edward Frank wrote:
|
ENTS,
As we continue to try to find a way to characterize the
aesthetics of a
site, and figure out the structure of how to rank sites
by their
biological importance and aesthetics we should continue
to look at a
broad range of approaches. I found a nice description of
Native Plant
communities in the Minnesota DNR website:
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/npc/index.html
|
Ed-
How do we categorize native plant associations that have
significantly
changed due to reduction of native species( white elm, chestnut,
soon to
be native ashes in general, and hemlock), as opposed to alien
introduction?
Also, the species makeup of some "native" plant
communities seems to be
a judgment call, in that we don't really know the agents of
dispersal of
some trees, especially black locust, persimmon, and pecan( and
is range
extension caused by squirrels, possums, or raccoons any more
valid than
intentional planting by native peoples prior to European
settlement?).
As I walk through our local metro-park, I see all the native
trees and
shrubs I would expect to see--red, black, pin, bur, and white
oaks; red,
sugar, and black maples; hornbeam, white and green ash--but also
Norway
maple looking happy as a clam, growing and competing
enthusiastically,
as well as Japanese holly and burning bush looking as though
it's always
been there in the understory.
This is just an observation, but it could be that our view of
"nativeness" is just a "snapshot in time"
construct.
Given all of that, it still is hard to beat the aspect of a
forest like
Hueston Woods in late April.
Steve Galehouse
|
Re:
Native Plant Communities Definition |
foresto-@npgcable.com |
Jan
08, 2007 07:28 PST |
Ed-
An excellent opportunity for me to segue back to a post where I
was
advocating for understory representation in the data collected
at
old-growth/exceptional tree sites. Bob makes a good point in
that the
communities may have changed drastically over time, but I'd say
that
they are what they are, and they're what we have representing
the
site's associations...who knows what lurks in the seed banks!
-DonB
|
RE:
Native Plant Communities Definition |
Edward
Frank |
Jan
09, 2007 15:44 PST |
Steve,
I don't know the answer to your question. I am searching for
different
ways to look at various aspects of naturalness and want to share
this
definition with the ENTS community.
Ed
|
Re:
Native Plant Communities Definition |
Joshua
Kelly |
Jan
10, 2007 00:08 PST |
Steve,
Questions about nativeness and naturalness define the
restoration efforts of
today. Visually and competitively, your "snapshot in
time" makes sense.
However, from the perspective of evolutionary ecology, a
"snapshot" of 100
years of exotic organism introductions severely alters
evolutionary
relationships that have been in place for time spans several
orders of
magnitude longer. A snapshot of your local metro park in another
100 years
will probably reveal a forest more strongly dominated by Norway
maple,
barberry and maybe bittersweet. Sometimes it seems that we as a
culture
attempt to alleviate our collective guilt for wrecking havoc on
balanced
ecosystems by seeing Homo domesticus as Mother Nature's most
effective
dispersal agent. Truly effective dispersal agents don't destabilize
the
natural communities they rely on to survive. My thoughts about
humans as
agents of natural disturbance are similar. For these reasons, I
value
efforts to maintain natural communities composed of species with
long
evolutionary histories on this continent and disturbance regimes
that don't
rely on humans - or where humans mimic natural processes no
longer
economically desirable at large scales.
Although I do not to agree with the notion that Japanese holly
is part of
our native plant communities, I don't think its presence
excludes a whole
forest from being native. In this case, disagreement about the
definition
of native plant communities has led me to some engaging
thoughts.
Thanks for bringing it up,
Josh
|
|