Requiem
for a Forest |
Gary
A. Beluzo |
Nov
06, 2005 17:01 PST |
Monica:
This is not a scientific post. This is an impression to a
discovery behind
my dad's house.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
My childhood forest was "murdered" this past week. It
was not "harvested",
for no mature trees were left standing as a seed source, and
unlike an
agricultural field, the logger approached the forest with an
unrelenting
blitzkrieg; it was not "mined" for that word should be
reserved for rock,
sand, and other nonliving resources. No, in a very real sense
the forest
was "murdered", every single living tree was taken-
the oak forest was
clearcut. Where once a complex living system flourished, now a
greatly
simplified landscape lays testament to the folly of human
management.
This past weekend I personally witnessed bad forestry. Although
several
weeks ago the old widow that lives next door assured me that the
forest was
to be marked by an experienced forester and logged by a
responsible company,
the reality is that she never ventures out her door, she has
never seen the
forest behind her house, she has no real connection to the land.
Neither
did the forester that marked the property. Neither did the
logger that
ripped gaping holes in the forest floor pulling the dead logs
from the cut.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
I am already working on a poem "Requiem for a Forest"
which will be set to
music eventually. Whereas science is an appropriate medium for
knowing a
forest objectively, only music can convey the total impression
that a forest
makes on us. Thank you once again for bringing music to our ENTS
rendezvous
this year.
Gary
|
RE:
ENTS Poetry and Prose Session |
Monica
Jakuc |
Nov
07, 2005 10:15 PST |
Dear Gary,
My deepest condolences to you in your grief.
In my view, this is a call-to-arms to all of us to remain
vigilant and
to continue to do everything we can to save our precious trees.
I look forward to seeing and hearing your poem, with or without
music.
Maybe it can become part of the ENTS rendezvous events in
october 2006.
With sympathy,
Monica
|
On
Gary's Pain |
Robert
Leverett |
Nov
07, 2005 11:20 PST |
Gary,
We all hurt for you and we hurt for the damaged land of your
youth.
The situation that you've described causes me to think back to
the time
on our list when we entertained forestry topics as a main part
of our
discussion framework. We had the two maverick foresters, who for
all
their insensitivity were basically right about the abominable
state of
forest practices in Massachusetts and the impotence of the
Bureau of
Forestry. Guess nothing has changed. With exceptions of course,
local
loggers continue to be dopes at best and renegades/conartists at
the
worst, often scamming land owners who are perpetually ignorant
of the
current value of their trees and the potential of their land to
yield
forest products for many years - if managed carefully. We could
rehash
bad forest practices on the list, but it would serve little
purpose. All
of us in ENTS make up the choir. It is just unfortunate that the
two
maverick foresters who had such potential for making positive
contributions couldn't quite grasp that simple fact.
Pictures of the butchery that you
describe should be circulated via
the web without property identification, but with a clear
message:
unsupervised logging operations are a disaster. The sad, sad
case
appears to be that there was a professional? private forester
who was
supposed to oversee the logging operations. It appears the
forester
couldn't be trusted either. And the weak, excuse-making
professional
forestry societies in Mass can be counted on to look the other
way. They
are worthless.
What makes me as sick as the rape of
that property is that the
really fine foresters like the late Karl Davies, Michele Wilson,
Bruce
Spencer, Russ Richardson, and Ehrhard Frost get tarnished by the
misbehavior of their shortcutting associates. I'm sure that any
one of
the above would feel as sick as you did at seeing the death of
that
forest.
Bob
|
Re:
On Gary's Pain |
Fores-@aol.com |
Nov
07, 2005 14:55 PST |
Gary:
The worst thing is that in addition to the environmental
destruction of such
a harvest as you described, the widow may well have only
received about 10
to 25% of what her pillaged and plundered forest was really
worth and the
harvest guidelines were probably along the lines of..."you
nice young men do what
you think is right"
Russ Richardson |
|