Loss
of a tree friend |
wad-@comcast.net |
Apr
08, 2007 17:41 PDT |
ENTS
Today I attended Easter services at the church where I was
reared. The Harmonyville Church of the Bretheren was built in
1846 on land donated by the Keim family. The Keim family was
granted the land by William Penn in the late 1600's to early
1700's. The church yard is dotted with several white oaks and
some hickory. Twenty years ago, I was asked how old the trees
were in my opinion. I had said they were at least 150 years old.
From birth, I spent nearly every Sunday, some Saturdays and
three weeks in the summer at day camp here. My Mother was the
camp nurse before I was able to attend, but she brought me
along. In the parking lot, surrounded by asphalt, is a kidney
shaped island that contained two white oaks. I have never
measured them, as they were niether fat, or tall. My estimate is
that they are 11-12' in circumference and 80-90 feet tall.
Unassuming never the less. They are leftovers from the original
woods, and several similar trees still exist around the church
and in the strip of woods between the church and the Keim/Kolle
farm. I remember fighting everyday at camp for a spot on the
roots to sit and eat my lunch. There were about five or seven
large roots that a child could sit on and set their lunch on to
eat. It was coveted. A nice shady spot close to the four square
court.
Today I was shocked to see one of the trees laying on the ground
in the upper part of the gravel parking area. I quickly searched
the the grounds to see which tree met it's end. I then saw the
stump, and my heart sank. My old friend was now just a stump.
The other tree now had the appearance of leaning away from the
stump as if afraid. They had grown up together and took on equal
parts of the available light to form one giant canopy. I
immediately went to the stump and dropped down on it and began
to count the rings. 246! That acorn sprouted in 1761. I guess I
was off on my estimate, but not the way I had intended to find
out.
I will miss this tree, and the churchyard will never look the
same to me. The sad part is that the tree had dead in it's top,
and that is why it was removed. The trunk was completely solid
in the 40' of trunk I saw there. I wish I could have helped make
the decision. Oh well. I hope they leave the stump. I intend to
measure and document the remaining trees on my next visit, as
there are bigger white oaks there.
Side note:
I also visited a cemetery that was unknown to me. It was an old
family plot for the Potts family. It had a couple of
Revolutionary markers and some civil war markers, along with a
number of large tulip poplars. The oldest death was 1782. Many
markers were simply stones at the head and foot with a letter
etched in them. Very cool.
Scott |
Re:
Digest for ENTST-@topica.com, issue 1829 |
Rowan |
Apr
09, 2007 22:39 PDT |
I'm thinking about the "Loss of A Friend..." I first
came across ENTS
a year ago, when the Wisconsin state champion white oak was cut
down,
and I was fruitlessly trying to save twigs of the tree by
bud-grafting
(it didn't work.)
That tree was more than an old friend to me...Old, too; 192
rings to
the heart-rot hollow; probably ~250 as the minimum reasonable
age.
That magnificent oak was cut down by a farmer who didn't like
people
coming to see the tree.
A year later, this spring, just two weeks ago, a beautiful, huge
old
sycamore, 20.5 feet in girth, was cut down on the Ohio State
University campus. The bitter irony is that this tree was cut by
the
university to make way for a new, "green" student
union building. This
beautiful old sycamore tree, along with 4 century-old oaks, a
number
of ninety year old elms, and some sugar maples were all cut in
the
name of this "environmentally friendly" new building.
Both cases make me wonder what to think of our
society--especially,
the hypocrisy of Ohio State's "greenwashing" the
construction project.
The construction plan calls for creating a "green
corridor" of
newly-planted trees in front of the Union...nobody on the
planning
committee seemed to think about how not in their lifetime (or
their
children's, for that matter) will a sycamore like that one grow
there
again. As long as our society views trees like cornstalks that
can be
planted and reaped, we will continue to, well, go the direction
we're
heading.
|
Re:
Loss of a friend, back to Rowan |
wad-@comcast.net |
Apr
10, 2007 05:48 PDT |
Rowan
Unfortunately it happens much too often. We had a similar
instance here at work. I work for the Sisters of St. Francis.
They are very environmentally minded, and one of their works is
an organic farm. They decided to build a barn on the farm, and
sought grant money to put solar panels on the roof. They angled
the building just so to collect as much sun as possible etc...
The report given to them said it would be like planting a bunch
of trees, and the reduced pollution would be this much, and it
went on. The savings in dollars was tabulated also. What they
didn't consider was the placement of the barn. Even after my
informing them to place the barn further away from the wood
line, they plopped it in the root zone of a 100 year old ash
tree growing on the edge of the woods. They didn't want it out
in the middle of the fields. Never mind the 20
or so smaller trees that were cleared to install the barn. In
the long run the ash had to be removed because it shaded the
solar
panels too much. Since the barn was already in place it cost
3500 to remove the tree. I imagine if they sat down and tallied
the value to the environment of the 20 small trees and the one
large one combined with the removal cost of the ash, it isn't
that green of an idea. I wonder if people will ever think
through a project to the point that it is as green as possible.
I often think it is more publicity and marketing than anything
else.
Scott
|
RE:
Loss of a friend, back to Rowan |
Matthew
Hannum |
Apr
17, 2007 15:15 PDT |
Sad stories indeed... The Ohion State one deserves some sort of
prize -
cutting down the trees to make way for an environementally
friendly
area... argh!
Part of the problem is that most people simply are not taught to
"think
green." Basic environmental awareness is not taught at any
level in our
schools, and the amount of ignorance in the world is staggering.
Worst
is the willful ignorance - those who chose to remain uninformed
since
learning something might take up their time and cause them to
have to
think of others or "outside the box." Still, most
people know little to
nothing about trees, tree care, or the environment beyond basic
stuff
such as "don't pollute." It's just so sad, really, and
so needless.
Here's my own example: The "monument to failed real estate
greed" just
up the road from me. Take a good-sized woodland (though probably
lacking
any large trees of note) - a couple of hundred acres, I think,
so it
would have been a modest park-size, and then cut it all down to
build a
unwanted and completely unneccessary shopping mall. Then, after
cutting
down all the trees and leaving nothing but bare dirt, don't
bother
building the mall! Everybody loses!
|
|