Elders
Grove, MTSF, MA |
Robert
Leverett |
Aug
22, 2005 08:09 PDT |
ENTS:
Yesterday, I went to the Elders Grove in
MTSF with the intention of
modeling the huge Saheda Pine - a tree that Will Blozan Climbed
in 1998.
Now at 163.6 feet in height and 11.44 feet in circumference,
this tree
remains arrow straight. It is one gorgeous, charismatic tree.
After putting 18 measurements into a
spreadsheet, running the
numbers, and a subsequent telephone discussion with Will Blozan,
I've
settled on 815 cubic feet of trunk and limb volume as the first
determination for Saheda. Given the relatively large girth for
this New
England stand-grown white pine, it is apparent to me that the
1,000-cubic feet club for New England is going to be crying for
members.
BTW, I added 5.5% to the trunk volume to cover the moderately
large
limbs. However, 5.5% may be high for this tree. It may be no
more than
5%, which would drop the total volume to 810 cubic feet.
In terms of comparisons, the Henry David
Thoreau pine in MSF weighs
in at 864 cubic feet with proper allowance for limb volume. The
modeling
was done by BVP. We can swear by the numbers. The Ice Glen pine
is
somewhere between 1,125 and 1,200 cubes. The Ice Glen pine
reigns
supreme. However, I will model the Ice Glen tree again to refine
my
first modeling. I expect the final volume will come out to
between 1,125
and 1,175 cubic feet.
After modeling Saheda, I re-measured the
red maple growing nearby.
It once was the champion tall tree red maple for New England.
Earlier
this year, it lost to another MTSF red maple in the Trout Brook
area of
MTSF. Well, the Clark Ridge maple has regained its status. It is
now a
surprising 127.5 feet in height. In two seasons it has grown
nearly 2
feet. So, as of now, it takes over the number one spot from the
Trout
Brook tree as the red maple tall tree champ of all New England.
Somewhere in southern Connecticut, a taller one may grow, but
chances
are I won’t find it.
The red maple’s added height raises
MTSF's Rucker index. It now
stands at 135.59. This is higher than I thought the index ever
would go
and reflects the intense amount of searching required to home in
on the
tallest of each species. Nudging up the Rucker index for a site
that
covers 1,000 acres or more is a labor intensive effort.
This summer has seen the Tree Amigos do
very little work on the
Rucker Index in New England. The reason hasn’t been lack of
interest.
There is always interest. But high temperatures and high
humidity have
been prevalent throughout July and August. When cooler days
arrive,
we’ll speed up our pace. There are lots of trees to re-measure
and the
results will not raise the index. It will lower it. What follows
is my
best guess as to what the index will look like.
Estimated
Species Height
WP 167.3
WA 152.0
SM 134.1
NRO 133.6
HM 130.8
BNH 129.1
RM 127.5
BC 125.5
ABW 125.4
AB 122.5
R.I. 134.78
There is a small chance of finding an
American Beech at around 125
to replace the current champ this is 130 – but a tree that I
doubt still
stands. Also, the BNH champ could be taller. There is a slight
chance of
building the index back up to 135.
Bob |
|