Trees
and pavement |
Robert
Leverett |
Nov
15, 2005 10:10 PST |
Scott,
In urban areas I've often seen large trees surrounded by
pavement that
goes right up to within a couple of feet of the trunk. The
pavement
might extend in all directions for quite a distance and channel
runoff
into the drainage system. I've often wondered how a large tree
in such
conditions is able to maintain itself. I assume even though
there is a
pavement covering that the tree has some source of underground
water
available to it. Lots of questions here. Would you mind casting
some
light on this subject? Thanks.
Bob
|
Re:
Trees and pavement |
wad-@comcast.net |
Nov
15, 2005 12:18 PST |
Bob
You hit it on the head. Trees seek out water. It could have it's
roots in a sewer line, a water line, a natural spring. Depending
on the tree, the roots can extend over 2.5 times the height of
the tree. Here on our property there is a European Beech that is
very close to the state champion status. It is 62" dbh and
80'+ tall. It is planted within 40' of a building and surrounded
by sidewalk. I often wondered how it did so well. During a
construction project, we discovered a huge brick chamber, that
collects downspout water, within the root zone of the tree. We
do not yet know the length or width, but the water was eleven
feet deep!! It was also full during the drought. This tree is
about 160 yrs old, and this constant water source has to be a
factor to it's survivability. Sometimes a large tree is paved up
to it's roots, and it starts to die. Often a large tree can live
for many years after the critical blow has been delivered.
Example: We removed a 187 year old Black oak (ring count) in
2004. The root zone was cut through during the installation of
public sewer in the 60's, and in my opinion was the cause of
death. Another example: We removed a 178 year old White oak
(ring count) that had been buried 2' in 1961. We noticed the
tree was under heavy attack by Gypsy moth caterpillars, we
excavated the soil away, and the tree died the next year. My
point is those big trees you see with pavement up to the trunk
may be dying as we speak, just not dead yet.
If a tree is newly planted in these
conditions, it stands a better chance at living. I think the
change to the trees environment is too shocking. As mentioned
some trees fair better in certain circumstances.
Scott
|
RE:
Trees and pavement |
Will
Blozan |
Nov
15, 2005 12:51 PST |
Bob, Scott...
I have heard conflicting ideas on pavement. Some say pavement is
a barrier
to evaporation and as such keeps the soil beneath constantly
moist, i.e. it
can't dry out. However, soil oxygen is in short supply.
Floodplain species
such as American elm and American sycamore (and blackgum as
well) seem to be
able to deal with paving OK (at least relative to other species)
since they
can tolerate anaerobic soil conditions for extended periods of
time.
I consulted on a large elm (3' dbh) here in Black Mountain that
had been
covered under the entire drip line with hot asphalt mix. They
even ran the
mix up the root (trunk) flares. I pronounced the tree doomed.
Anyway, the
tree is currently perfect and that was in 1987. I suspect the
roots were
able to exploit areas beyond the pavement; in fact they were
likely already
there.
Trees are cool!
Will B
|
RE:
Trees and pavement |
wad-@comcast.net |
Nov
15, 2005 13:43 PST |
Will
I wonder if that Elm has a water source underground, or it may
not be dead yet. It can take along time, although paving is
different than cutting through a root system close to the trunk.
Those big oaks took 40 years to die.
Scott
|
roots,
mulch, paving & soil compaction |
GSRT-@aol.com |
Nov
16, 2005 12:51 PST |
ENTsters:
Trees installed into vaults in paved areas tend to explore what
is available
to them, but, in truth, they really become "temporary"
trees. Their root
systems may actually fill the available space, and compress the
soil to a point
where the soil will not hold moisture. This can also be the case
with trees grown
in large boxes or tubs.
In hindsight, I regret that I have not written down the upteen
"old wives
tales" that encompass tree roots, as they would have made a
very interesting
book! ... tap roots grow 40 feet deep... roots seek water...
roots are only under
the canopy... you cannot plant trees within 50 feet of a
foundation... roots
grow straight down... you cannot transplant Post Oaks.... Folks
in rural Texas
tend to anthropromorphize trees and their components.
I once saw Post Oaks dying 300 feet upslope from a pasture where
Velpar
herbicide was applied to kill Mesquite stumps. We may never
know, or have the
ability to determine, how far roots range from a given tree.
I have also seen Live Oaks killed where herbicide residue was
washed , by
rainfall, across a parking lot from a railroad ROW... the tree
roots were
apparently under the concrete at a range of 150 ft. +, from the
trees, and the
diluted chemicals seeped into the expansion joints.
It appears that, the condensate resulting at the interface of
the subsoil and
bottom of the concrete, is adequate to support some tree
species. Also, air
apparently does infiltrate the expansion joints and perhaps some
rainfall.
The never-ending disagreement between structural engineers and
arborists over
tree roots damaging house foundations. I have seen massive root
invasion and
foundation lifting due to roots (Live Oak) following the
original sewer/water
trench under an engineered slab foundation. These trenches are
never compacted
and therefore, appear to be reasonably aerated and moist. The
small roots
infiltrate the boundry between the slab and pad soil and when
they expand
diametrically, they act like a jack.... amazing stuff!
Tree roots are THE most important part of a tree and the part
least
understand!
G. Sandy Rose, RCA
Registered Consulting Arborist
Shade Masters, Inc.
Arlington, Texas
|
(Pre-)
Trees and pavement |
Robert
Leverett |
June
03, 2003 |
Lee:
There's always a reason. Thriving in paved-over areas due to the
species adaptation to oxygen-deprived environments made
immediate sense - once you said it. I'm now thinking of the
cottonwood corridors I regularly pass that have developed
adjacent to paved areas. Of course!
------------------------------
Lee Frelich
wrote: (06-03-03)
Cottonwood
only grows into a big tree (15' cbh) on deep soils, and also it
is extremely intolerant of shade and cannot compete (especially
at the seedling stage) with other species that are more
shade-tolerant once you get far from the river. Cottonwood can
function as an early successional species after a major
disturbance (tornado, flood, fire, clearcutting), regardless of
distance from the river. But it cannot grow in its own shade,
and it only dominates for long time periods in areas where there
is frequent flooding, since it can better survive the period of
root saturation and lack of oxygen than other species, and it is
even a little better at that than silver maple. The seedlings
can grow to heights of 10 or 20 feet in a year or two, thus
getting above the flood levels of all but the greatest floods
(we have 40 foot floods in the Midwest, but only every 10 or 20
years, a typical spring flood is only 10-15 feet). Any seedling
that is totally submerged for more than a few hours will die.
|
RE:
Trees and pavement |
Steve
H. |
Jun
22, 2006 19:20 PDT |
Will, Bob, ...
Here in Framingham, MA where I live there is a beautiful
American Elm
which is apparently in perfect health and is probably fairly old
though
it is not a really "big" tree. It is completely
surrounded by pavement
up to the trunk/roots and interrupts a sidewalk (I suspect it
predates
the sidewalk). On one side of the sidewalk is a busy road and on
the
other is a large parking lot which services a mini-mall which
looks like
it was built in the early 1970's. Across the street is another
sidewalk
and then after ten feet of grass is a nursing home with a
sizable
parking lot.
The tree is in a low lying area of town and there is a large
pond on the
other side of the mini-mall so I think it is getting plenty of
water.
What amazes me is that the soil is probably poorly oxygenated
and there
has been no chance of soil nutrient replenshiment for at least
30 years.
To make things tougher on the tree the road that it abuts is
torn up
every ten or fifteen years to be repaved as it is one of the
main roads
leading into the center of town; most recently last summer.
Somehow it survives nicely and apparently is immune to the
ravages of
DED which wiped out almost every other elm in town many years
ago.
Steve H.
|
RE:
Trees and pavement |
Robert
Leverett |
Jun
23, 2006 05:02 PDT |
Steve,
On occasion I see a tree growing and thriving
where no
self-respecting tree should be. I am alway amazed and puzzled
since the
model that I carry in my head says that both water and air must
be in
the soil around a tree's roots. Maybe Will, Lee Scott, etc. can
shed
some light on this.
Bob
|
RE:
Trees and pavement |
Darian
Copiz |
Jun
23, 2006 07:11 PDT |
Steve,
It's one reason elms were planted so extensively - because they
are
tough. A lot of the floodplain species have been used as street
trees
because they can handle compacted soil, alkaline soil, and some
other
adverse conditions better than others. Having sediment layered
over
their roots and being banged up by floating debris is similar to
some
urban situations. I don't quite understand why many of them are
drought
resistant though or what biological mechanism gives them an
advantage in
these tough situations.
Darian
|
RE:
Trees and pavement |
Steve
Hewlett |
Jun
23, 2006 07:32 PDT |
Ed,
I found the "trees and pavement" original messages
through the archive
here: http://www.nativetreesociety.org/threads/trees_and_pavement.htm.
It
is the second topic listed under the heading "Tree
Care".
I moved to Framingham a little over four years ago and the
lonely elm
growing out of the sidewalk at the mini-mall caught my eye right
away.
It is an absolutely gorgeous specimen living under really
adverse
conditions. If it seeds this fall I will try and collect a few
seeds. I
suspect that tree is quite old even though it's circumference is
proabably only about 7-8 feet or so with a height of about 70
feet. It
is in an old part of town and if it predates the sidewalk it
grows out
of then it is probably at least a hundred years old or more.
Framingham
was settled in the mid 1600's. It seems to me that trees that
grow under
adverse conditions are not going to reach optimum or even
average size
for the species, sort of an unintentional bonsai process.
Steve
|
RE:
Trees and pavement |
wad-@comcast.net |
Jun
23, 2006 08:09 PDT |
Steve
Part of the reason that certain trees can tolerate compacted
soils, as well as very wet conditions, is that their roots don't
require much oxygen. Both conditions are anerobic. Sycamore,
Elm, Pin oak, red maple, and others are tolerant of wet and
compacted environments.
Darian
I like the analogy of sediments covering the roots to asphalt
and sidewalks covering the roots, and debris bumping into the
trunks like cars do. Very interesting.
Scott
|
RE:
Trees and pavement |
Lee
E. Frelich |
Jun
23, 2006 09:53 PDT |
Bob, Steve:
Elms don't need a lot of oxygen, since they are floodplain
species. That
is why they do so well in cities.
|
|