historical
sycamore dimensions |
Dale
Luthringer |
Mar
22, 2007 16:14 PST |
Ents,
Here's a little behind the scenes discussion Scott & I had
on some
historical sycamore accounts along the Allegheny & Ohio
Rivers:
Celeron's expedition along the Allegheny in 1748, Washington's
notes of
a canoe exploration on newly acquired land in 1770. Hope you
don't mind
Scott. Just that others might have some insight on this too.
Dale
-----Original Message-----
From: Luthringer, Dale J
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:25 AM
To: '
Subject: RE: sycamore site?
yeh, most likely.
I think during Celeron's expedition down the Allegheny they
describe a
monstrous "cottonwood" that they could fit some
ungodly number of people
and/or oxen inside. I think the cottonwood he described would
most
likely have been a sycamore. Can't put my hands on that text
though at
the moment.
Dale
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 1:51 PM
To: Luthringer, Dale J
Subject: RE: sycamore site?
I would have
to guess they were coppices? I guess anything is possible
though. Johnny Appleseed used to live in hollow sycamores, so
who
knows?
There are two champs at the norway spruce address, but I can't
think of
what the other one is right now.
Thanks, Scott
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Luthringer, Dale J"
Scott,
Here's an interesting quote from George Washington's Journal,
1770 I
just read in 'Early History of Western Pennsylvania' by I.D.
Rupp
(copyright 1846!). He was traveling down the Ohio River from
Pittsburgh
in a large dugout canoe with other travelers looking at
potential
settlement areas for soldiers. The large sycamore he describes
below
was near the junction of the Ohio & Kenhawa Rivers:
"November 4th, 1770
After passing these hills, which may run on the river near a
mile, there
appears to be a nother pretty good bottom on the east side, - At
this
place we met a canoe going to Illinois with sheep, and at this
place
also, that is, at the end of the bottom from the Kenhawa, just
as we
came to the hills, we met with a sycamore about 60yards from the
river,
of a most extraordinary size; it measruing 3ft from the ground,
and 45ft
round, lacking 2 inches; and not 50yards from it was another,
31ft
around. After passing this bottom, and about a mile of hills, we
entered another bottom and encamped.- This bottom reaches within
about a
half mile of the rapid, at the point of the Great Bend."
I can't even imagine a sycamore that would be ~14ft across 3ft
up from
the ground, let alone a ~10footer right beside it!
Dale
|
Re:
historical sycamore dimensions |
Fores-@aol.com |
Mar
22, 2007 17:23 PST |
Dale:
The area described is now the site of Pont Pleasant, WV and most
of the
Islands in the Ohio River on both sides of Point Pleasant for
over 100 miles are
now part of a preserve managed by the National Park Service. It
is said that
some of those islands still contain some monstrous sycamore. George
Washington was once the owner of over 10,000 acres in the Point
Pleasant, Lower
Kanawha Valley area.
Russ
|
Re:
historical sycamore dimensions |
brown_-@colstate.edu |
Mar
23, 2007 06:35 PST |
I believe there have been some attempts to do historic
reconstructions
from witness trees from Washington's surveys in Western Virginia
-- I
think the consensus is that his journals and field notes are
accurate.
Roger Brown
|
Re:
historical sycamore dimensions |
djluth-@pennswoods.net |
Mar
23, 2007 07:08 PST |
Russ,
Super, thanks for your input. Are you familiar with the Scioto
River in
Southern Ohio? I have a friend who sent me an article on a type
of old growth
sycamore/river bottom site that might have promise, just don't
have it on hand
at the moment.
Dale
|
Re:
historical sycamore dimensions |
Fores-@aol.com |
Mar
23, 2007 07:52 PST |
Dale:
I've heard of the Scioto and I have driven along a little of it.
From what
I have experienced working with private woodlands in interior of
WV is that
there are numerous small patches of old growth scattered on
farms across the
region. My best gut feeling tells me that there should be at
least a few
small areas of fairly undisturbed old growth along some major
stream
corridors....especially if it was never rail roaded.
I have worked a great deal along the Little Kanawha River and
some of the
sycamore sites are extremely impressive... especially when it is
possible to
compare photos from the early 1900's to the current reality.
My best guess is that a boating expedition along some of the
navigable
lower reaches of Ohio River tributaries could prove interesting.
Russ
|
Re:
historical sycamore dimensions |
djluth-@pennswoods.net |
Mar
23, 2007 08:17 PST |
Roger,
He usually was very good in his descriptions & land nav
since he did a lot of
surveying work. I just remember his account up to Ft. LeBoeuf as
he was
delivering Governor Dinwiddie's letter to the French (1753?)
that they were on
"British" soil, where it appears that some of his
distances on his mapped route
didn't quite pan out. They're Indian guides led them on a series
of alternate
routes criss crossing the Allegheny River, French Creek, and
other tribs due to
the usual routes being flooded out and absolutely miserable
weather.
Dale
|
Re:
historical sycamore dimensions |
djluth-@pennswoods.net |
Mar
23, 2007 11:02 PST |
Russ,
Now there's a future Ents trip. I'm slowly working my way down
the islands in
the Allegheny River Islands Wilderness Area. There are
definitely some
beauties on some of these islands just waiting to be discovererd,
can't even
imagine what might be down in your neck of the river.
|
|