Tree
heights at the northern edge of their range |
Lee
Frelich |
Jun
06, 2004 10:43 PDT |
ENTS:
After watching mulberry and catalpa trees in Minneapolis and red
maples and
red oaks in the Boundary Waters of northern Minnesota for more
than decade,
I am beginning to understand how extreme cold limits tree
heights to a
heights much less than the potential for the soils conditions.
This last winter we had an extreme cold spell, and most
mulberries and
catalpas in Minneapolis this spring have lost 5-10 feet in
height due to
dieback. This seems to happen every 5 years or so.
I wonder if most trees routinely lose a small amount of height
quite often
due to dieback from cold in the northern edge of their range,
thus
contributing to the pattern of shorter heights with increasing
latitude.
Next Saturday I will check some of the red maples and red oaks
at Hegman
Lake in northern MN, where it was down to -50 last January. It
will be
interesting if they have died back again like they did after the
cold
winter of 1995.
Lee |
RE:
Tree heights at the northern edge of their range |
Gary
A. Beluzo |
Jun
06, 2004 16:20 PDT |
Lee:
So you are hypothesizing that the shorter overall height gain of
the red
maples, red oaks, and mulberries results more from natural
"pruning"
rather than altered physiology due to the cold? That is really
interesting Lee, I look forward to further posts on this topic.
Gary
Gary A. Beluzo
Professor of Environmental Science
Holyoke Community College
|
RE:
Tree heights at the northern edge of their range |
Lee
E. Frelich |
Jun
07, 2004 06:01 PDT |
Gary:
Yes, for some species pruning by freezing of the upper crown
appears to
limit height. For other species, and perhaps for these same
species further
south, there is probably still a height limitation caused by
length of
growing season.
Lee
|
|