Proposed
Chestnut Ridge Wilderness Area: Allegheny National Forest,
PA |
Carl
Harting |
Oct
11, 2005 18:39 PDT |
Ed,
I think we should plan a measuring trip to the proposed Chestnut
Ridge
Wilderness Area in the northern section of the Allegheny
National Forest
next Spring. I've read that there's been good Chestnut
regeneration in
that area, so maybe we'll find some tall ones. Hopefully we can
get
some information about which part of the area contains the best
trees,
because it's big (about 5000 acres).
Carl
|
Proposed
Chestnut Ridge Wilderness Area: Allegheny National Forest,
PA |
Dale
J. Luthringer |
Oct
24, 2005 18:14 PDT |
Ed, Carl,
You may want to contact:
Kirk Johnson - Exec Dir Friends of the Allegheny Wilderness
http://www.pawild.org
He's been busy putting a plan together presenting it to the
state to get
further protection of this area. I believe he should be able to
point
you in the right direction... better than just point and shoot
at least.
Dale
|
Proposed
Chestnut Ridge Wilderness Area: Allegheny National Forest,
PA |
Kirk
Johnson |
Oct
25, 2005 06:40 PDT |
Ed, Carl, Dale,
The highest concentration of chestnut trees I've found there are
located on
top of & around the ridge line from about 041 56' 32.6"
N (approximately
opposite the entry driveway to the Tracy Ridge campground), to
the north as
the ridge curves around in a NW direction. It's possible that
there may be
more at other points further south that I've missed in my own
excursions to
the area.
Also, I've been told by Allegheny National Forest personnel that
there are
some chestnut trees to the west of the proposed Chestnut Ridge
Wilderness
Area in the proposed Tracy Ridge Wilderness Area. Probably along
the ridge
line above Coffey Run. Don't know that there's as many there as
there are in
the Chestnut Ridge area though.
(Information about our wilderness proposal can be found online
at
http://www.pawild.org.
Click on the "Citizens' Proposal" link. Links to maps
of each proposed area are at the bottom of that page.)
Hope this helps!
Kirk Johnson
|
Proposed
Chestnut Ridge Wilderness Area: Allegheny National Forest,
PA |
Carl
Harting |
Oct
26, 2005 18:45 PDT |
Kirk,
If you don't mind, would you be able to post a quick update on
the
progress being made towards the designation of the various areas
you are
working on as "wilderness areas"?
Carl
|
Proposed
Chestnut Ridge Wilderness Area: Allegheny National Forest,
PA |
Kirk
Johnson |
Oct
27, 2005 12:21 PDT |
Carl,
The U.S. Forest Service is currently revising their long-term
management
plan for the Allegheny National Forest -- commonly referred to
as the
"Forest Plan." As part of that revision process, they
are required to
evaluate the ANF for it's wilderness potential. Currently, they
are
considering only three areas for recommendation as wilderness:
Chestnut
Ridge (~5,000 acres), Minister Valley (~9,000 acres), and Tracy
Ridge
(~9,000 acres).
We would like the Forest Service to fully evaluate all eight of
our proposed
wilderness areas ( http://www.pawild.org/exec_summary.html).
I'll also post
a recent editorial from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette specific to
this issue
we are having with the agency.
The Forest Service will release their Draft Environmental Impact
Statement
for Forest Plan revision early next year, probably January or
February. It
is important that they hear from the public now that all
potential ANF
wilderness must be considered in at least one Alternative of the
DEIS.
After the DEIS is released, there will be a 90-day public
comment period.
Later in '06, likely sometime in the fall, the Forest Service
will publish
their Final EIS for Forest Plan revision. We are hoping that
they will
recommend to Congress that a significant amount of new ANF
wilderness be
designated as part of that FEIS.
The Forest Service can make recommendations to Congress, but it
requires an
act of Congress, under the guidelines of the 1964 Wilderness
Act, to
formally designate wilderness.
If anyone would like to write to the Forest Service in support
of our
proposal, it would be very helpful. Please direct your
correspondence to:
Mr. William Connelly, Forest Planner
Forest Plan Revision
Allegheny National Forest
P.O. Box 36
Warren, PA 16365
Please ask Mr. Connelly to be sure that all eight of our
proposed areas be
considered for wilderness recommendation as part of the Draft
Environmental
Impact Statement for Forest Plan revision. Further information
is available
on our website at: http://www.pawild.org
Further information about America's National Wilderness
Preservation System
is available at: http://www.wilderness.net
Thanks for asking Carl!
Kirk
--
Kirk Johnson, Executive Director
Friends of Allegheny Wilderness
220 Center Street
Warren, PA 16365
(814) 723-0620
|
PPG:
Forest folly / Arbitrary lines hurt Pennsylvania preservation |
Kirk
Johnson |
Oct
27, 2005 12:35 PDT |
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05271/578746.stm
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
Editorial: Forest folly / Arbitrary lines hurt Pennsylvania
preservation
Sometimes, it doesn't take a bulldozer to make wilderness
vanish.
Bureaucrats can do it with the stroke of a pen, as in the case
of Allegheny
National Forest.
Ever since Congress passed the 1964 National Wilderness
Preservation System
Act, federal wilderness designation has preserved land from
logging,
construction and road-building while leaving it open to
recreational uses
like hunting, fishing, hiking, camping and horseback riding.
About 9,000 acres of wilderness areas exist in the ANF, and
thousands more
are eligible for wilderness evaluation during this round of
forest
management planning, now in its final stages and headed to
Congress for
approval in 2006.
Friends of the Allegheny Wilderness is pushing for more
designated
wilderness areas within the ANF and has created a list of
roadless tracts
for consideration based on a Forest Service inventory and a
federal
evaluation of roadless areas. But in 1997 the Forest Service
Eastern Region
ordered that a half-mile-wide buffer dividing roadless areas
from roads,
power lines and other unnatural features be deducted from their
official
acreage -- and that if what remained was under 2,500 acres, the
area would
not be up for wilderness evaluation.
The effect of this space-shaving is dramatic. One area, the
Allegheny Front,
dropped from 7,000 acres to 1,500; the Clarion River Tract
shrank from 6,000
to 958, and the Cornplanter Tract was lopped from 3,000 acres to
197, due to
the added loss of a half-mile on either side of an overgrown and
unusable
abandoned road that cuts through it.
Friends of the Allegheny Wilderness has been lobbying the Forest
Service to
rescind the 1997 directive, so far unsuccessfully. In the
meantime, of
roadless areas that had been eligible for wilderness evaluation,
the three
named have been ruled out by the Forest Service, three others
are still
eligible and three new ones have been proposed by the Friends.
The
conservation group will also lobby Congress, which isn't
required to accept
Forest Service recommendations, to consider the ineligible
areas.
The Forest Service's 1997 regional criteria apply only to
Eastern forests,
such as Allegheny National and Monongahela National Forest in
West Virginia;
the Wilderness Act sets no minimum acreage for designation.
Nationwide, many
federally designated areas are under 2,500 acres, the arbitrary
line drawn
by the directive.
The United States boasts huge wilderness areas, but only
two-tenths of 1
percent are in the heavily developed Northeast. The Friends of
the Allegheny
Wilderness are right to challenge arbitrary rules that leave
valuable lands
vulnerable. Our region needs to protect what little is left
among the
superhighways and sprawl.
--
Friends of Allegheny Wilderness
220 Center Street
Warren, PA 16365
|
|