Winston-Salem
Monster |
fores-@earthlink.net |
May
31, 2006 23:12 PDT |
The Winston-Salem Monster:
came across it by accident while passing through W-S, stopped at
tourist
info spot for bathroom and spotted a pamphlet about it.
it says the top half broke off who knows how long ago (just a
bit above
where you start seeing all the leaves), so it's no longer the
tallest thing
around for sure, but it is still at least 75' and maybe somewhat
more than
that. the diameter, I had no equipment with me, but the booklet
claimed
7.1' diameter. the back part is hollowed out, they said it was
hit by
lighting ages ago and so badly hollowed out and damaged the
timber cutters
left this forest grown remnant standing, the sole old-growth
tree left in
the park. It grows on a steepish slope so who knows at what
point they
measured, if they measured at bh from the base top soil then it
is even
fatter than 7.1'. It was really massive. Largest tulip I've ever
seen
(never been to Smokies or other prime old-growth areas down
here, I know
there are larger). There is a huge one on UNC campus too, half
of the top
half cracked off, but I think it is taller than this one, very
fat, if
perhaps a little bit less so. |
RE:
Winston-Salem Monster WOW |
fores-@earthlink.net |
Jun
01, 2006 15:10 PDT |
Hi,
I had this weird feeling before I left that I should bring
measuring
equipment, but I kept thinking that I was just running up Pilot
Mtn. to
meet a friend and there is no OG or anything there so why
bother. Anyway, I
had nothing with me and I didn't bother taking a careful enough
look to
really say. Don't think I'm so great at estimating heights quite
yet.
I would guess that there will not be enough left of the trunk
(and combined
with my vague recollection that it did taper a bit once it got
into the
leafy area) to measure out to the most astounding numbers,
although it
certainly does have a whopper of a base trunk for a least a bit
of a ways
up, as you can see from the photo taken from a distance. I seem
to recall
that it did break down quite low. I really wonder what the beast
was like
before that. Locally it seems to have such a history I imagine
there must
be tons of private photos of it, I wonder if any go back before
the time of
the break. I doubt it was a height record breaker type tree
though,
although there is one quote about "growing as tall as it is
wide", but I'm
still not so sure it was ever some 160-170' thing. All the same,
it was
quite impressive even as it was. It was easy to stand in
location where you
couldn't tell so easily the top was missing and it just felt so
immense.
OK, I just found another photo I took, it does show the break
pretty far
down.
As for direction I just found this:
http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?address=5600+Balsom+Rd&zipcode=27040
I kind of wound myself there using DeLorme maps that were
missing many
street names (as well, many of the streets were missing there
names with
signs torn down) and without anything more than "probably
somewhere along
Balsom Rd" (brochure for the tree has no map or anything),
so it's probably
easier to look at that map and find your own route. It is a bit
easy to
drive right past it as the turn in looks similar to a turn in to
a new
apartment development across the street and arriving from the
direction you
probably will the big sign is not so evident, although the road
into it is
easy to see. But it's really not to hard to find at all, nothing
like the
nightmare that is driving in Boston, easily the worst and most
confusing
place to drive (and I have done Manhattan, Queens, Bronx, LA and
much of
Orange County, CA). The tree itself is also easy. Just park at
the deepest
end of the parking lot. Walk down hill to the right about 15'
look across
the sort of torpid man made pond to the farthest shore and it
rises up
right there. It's a walk measure in yards, not miles. Trail is
almost more
suited for cards than people. Really close.
|
|