Philadelphia
area trees |
Anthony
M Kelly |
Dec
04, 2005 20:34 PST |
Scott and John,
A couple questions and a few comments on large trees in the
Philadelphia area.
Concerning the large trees that you come across in people's
yards or on the grounds of larger estates, do you think that
they were planted by people hundreds of years ago when the area
was first settled? Or, do you think any were they part of the original
forested landscape? What do you know about their ages?
Have most of them been "tended to" over the years
improving their health and size?
In particular, Scott, what do you know about big oak that you
found a couple of weeks ago. John what do you know about the
Lansdowne oak that you mention.
Scott, what do you mean by the "dog leg" of Chester
County?
I mentioned in an earlier posting that Northern Delaware should
have lots of big trees. I can remember driving
past large tracts of woodland that make up the country estates
of the wealthier families of the state. Same goes for parts of
Chester CO, PA. Since many of those estates have been in those
families since at least into the early 1800's and since their
purpose was "country leisure" and not timber
production, I would imagine that at least some of them must
contain tracts of old trees, perhaps even original forest.
What do you think?
Have you ever been into the woods on any of these larger wooded
rural (as opposed to suburban) estates?
There are similar estates in and around the Laurel Mountains in
Western, PA. Some of them must cover thousands of acres. I don't
know how far back they date, though. Pittsburgh money is not as
old as Philly or Delaware money. The Western PA versions may
well have come into being after the era of the great clear cuts.
Some simple historical research would probably give me more
insight into the question. I haven't yet taken the time to do
any, though.
Tony |
Re:
Philadelphia area trees |
wad-@comcast.net |
Dec
06, 2005 04:47 PST |
Tony
Planted or saved trees? Both. Some of the older estates were
planned gardens, and others cleared around the desirable trees.
The age of the trees can only be guessed. If the tree is a
forest remnant, I will use the factors from the forestry dept to
guesstimate age. If it is an open grown tree, I usually guess
low. I hope to get into coring soon to help this situation.
Often the biggest and oldest trees have had little if any care.
I find that a tree that is forgotten about, or not attended to,
can do better on it's own if it is growing in a good spot.
The two big oaks in Broomall have no history that I have found.
I hope to dig into this before October 06 when we take the
Longwood tour to see them. I am sure they were originally part
of some estate farm from 1700 something. Both trees were around
300 years old in my opinion. Maybe more. The biggest one was
probably there in 1682 when Penn landed.
Chester county has a narrow part that extends between Delaware
county and Montgomery county. It is mostly old money horse farms
and estates. Some are still intact, others subdivided.
I have been into a few farms in the Brandywine Valley with
permission. One 700 acre tract had alot of 30"+ hickory,
40"+ beech, 55"+ oak and sycamore. The owner (about
65) said his father timbered the property regularly. The areas
that had these trees were too wet or rocky to farm. It is still
an operating farm today. You have to remember that before the
money was made, and these farms became estates, that the wood
was the fuel for furnaces, lime kilns and the like. Northern
Delaware does have some property to be explored, but I am still
working on Pa.
Pittsburgh, or Fort Duquesne as the French called it, was
active in the 1750's. It did not develop like Philadelphia did though.
The estates were in the surrounding mountain regions.
Holidaysburg, Ebensburg, and other towns. I think there are alot
of trees to be found out that way. The big boom time came with
industrialization in the 1800's though. I would seek out the
homesteads of the Mellons, Carnegies, and others if they still
exist.
Scott
|
Re:
Philadelphia area trees |
Anthony
M Kelly |
Dec
06, 2005 19:43 PST |
Scott,
Thanks for answering my questions about Philly area trees. I
forgot that the forests in that area would have been under
enormous fuel-wood pressures as soon as it became well settled.
Still, it looks like you found some nice trees on the one
Chester CO farm.
Back to Western PA. Up until about the time of the great
depression there were quite a few country estates in the
Holidaysburg and Ebensburg areas. Not just Pittsburghers, but
New Yorkers, too, spent their summers there. Today, most are
completely gone. Manor houses and grand hotels were torn down
for the wood and properties were sold off. There are still a few
houses and garden areas left, usually in states of advanced
deterioration. I grew up near Ebensburg and have no memories of
seeing any big trees on or near any of them -- but I was looking
for them then either.
I recently visited the main grounds of the Schwab Estate in
Loretto, PA. It is really the only one that has been
continuously kept up. The Catholic Church bought it after
Charles M. Schwab died and converted the manor house into a monastery.
I didn't see any extraordinary trees on my visit. Who knows?
There may be a few on some of the more wooded areas of the
estate that I didn't visit. I wouldn't count on it, though.
Today, most of the intact Pittsburghers' country estates are
further south in the Ligoneer area. Like I said before, some
cover a lot of land in the mountains there. I think there is
more big/old tree potential down there.
By the way, I remember you telling me when we met at Cook Forest
in April that your wife is from Ebensburg. If you plan on being
in that area over the holidays, perhaps we could check out a few
of the nearby old estate grounds just for the hell of it.
Tony
|
|