Groundhog
Creek |
Jess
Riddle |
Dec
18, 2006 18:50 PST |
Ents,
A couple weeks ago I returned to the Pigeon River Gorge to see
more of
Dry Branch, and explore the rest of the Groundhog Creek
watershed.
The 160'+ tuliptrees and extremely tall Biltmore Ash in the one
southeast facing cove that I previously saw on Dry Branch
indicated
great potential for the area, but the gorge's complex geology
made
more tall forest far from a certainty.
A relatively low ridge separates Dry Branch from Groundhog
Creek, but
the latter receives more shelter from a large, steep sided ridge
to
the east. Several narrow, shallow coves drain west off that
ridge
into Groundhog Creek. The lowest of them have hemlocks and an
abundance of rhododendron on their lower reaches and open, white
oak
dominates forests at the upper ends. Farther upstream and at
slightly
higher elevation, tuliptree dominates the coves, and the
drainages
begin to resemble moist, north facing sites. Basswood also
occurs in
the canopy along with scattered northern red oaks and
cucumbertrees,
although buckeye is absent, and the understories are largely
free of
rhododendron. Flat areas also occur along that stretch of
stream.
Hemlocks, white pines, and birches dominate in the upper flats,
but
the lower flats have forests resembling a rich, low elevation
cove.
Tuliptree dominates as usual, but basswood, black locust,
shagbark
hickory, and sycamore make up the rest of the canopy. Each large
tributary of the stream also flows across part of a small
plateau.
The flat area on Holly Bottom Branch was farmed, and other
sections of
the plateau likely have similar disturbance history.
Dry Branch has somewhat simpler topography. Steep slopes line
the
east side of the stream, and many, shallow, southeast facing
coves
that become progressively larger going upstream line the west
side.
Hemlocks, white pines, and black birch line the stream, but
hardwoods
dominate in the coves. The lower parts of the uppermost coves
were
clear-cut by the Forest Service about 10 years ago. All the
other
coves have tuliptree dominated canopies, and in most at least a
few
trees reach 150'. Rich cove species like basswood and buckeye
are
lacking, but pignut hickory, oaks and on the edges, white pine
fill in
the canopy.
Species Cbh Height
Ash, Biltmore 6.53' 129.9'
Basswood 5.50' 130.2'
Beech, American 8.01' 124.8'+
Cucumbertree 4.05' 123.2'
Cucumbertree NA 135.4'
Hemlock, Eastern NA 137.9'
Hickory, Pignut 6.36' 134.7'
Magnolia, Fraser 6.90' 117.6'
Maple, Red 5.04' 121.9'
Oak, N. Red 8.63' 137.3'
Oak, Sauls 5.68' 127.8'
Oak, White 6.56' 127.0'
Sycamore
6.42' 139.6'
All of the above trees grow on Groundhog Creek except the
hickory and
northern red oak. The fraser magnolia may be the tallest known
outside of the Smokies. Cucumbertrees under five feet cbh but
over
120' tall were scattered throughout the Groundhog Creek coves.
The
hemlock is a young, rapidly growing individual rather than an
older
remnant tree. Several other northern red oaks in the immediate
vicinity of the one listed above were only slightly shorter, but
tall
northern red oaks are scarce in the area overall. The sauls oak,
a
white-chestnut hybrid, is the second tallest measured by ENTS.
Several other white oaks in the lower coves were similar in
height.
Rucker Index 143.6'
Tuliptree
164.1'
White pine
158.3'
Biltmore ash 150.7'
Pignut hickory 140.9'
Sycamore 139.6'
Eastern hemlock 137.9'
Northern red oak 137.3'
Sauls oak 136.2'
Cucumbertree 135.4'
Basswood 135.2'
The basswood on adjacent Skiffley Creek is the only tree in the
Rucker
Index not in the Groundhog Creek watershed.
Jess Riddle |
RE:
Groundhog Creek |
Robert
Leverett |
Dec
19, 2006 05:19 PST |
Jess,
Are you creating a separate site from Skiffley
Creek for Dry Branch?
In our lists do we show two sites or one, though most of the
tallest
trees are in both? Should I add Dry Branch as a separate site
for Rucker
lists?
Bob
|
RE:
Groundhog Creek |
Joshua
Kelly |
Dec
20, 2006 10:18 PST |
Jess,
Of the two areas with preliminary height measurements in the
Bald Mountains,
the Bald Mountain Roadless Area and the Groundhog Creek area,
Groundhog
Creek now has the higher Rucker Index by 2'. Nice! Hopefully we
can visit
some of the other super-productive sites in the Bald, Nantahala,
and Unicoi
Mountains in coming months. By the way - incredible Fraser mag!
I also
think the Sycamore is the tallest known from the Balds.
Bien Hecho,
Josh
|
RE:
Groundhog Creek |
Joshua
Kelly |
Dec
20, 2006 17:10 PST |
Ed,
Dry Branch flows into Groundhog Creek, which is about four miles
up the
Pigeon River from the NC/TN line. A search for Groundhog Creek,
NC on
Topozone.com will get you there. It can also be found on the
Waterville
Quad. This area is just a few miles from the northeast boundary
of Great
Smoky Mountains NP, and on the other side of the Pigeon River.
The
Greenbrier Fault cuts through this area, and the erosion of the
state line
ridge over the eons by the Pigeon River has exposed many bands
of rock that
are rarely encountered in the Western Blue Ridge outside of the
river gorges
(Pigeon, French Broad, Nolichucky, Watauga etc...). The sweet
one here is
Pigeon Siltstone, though other groups of rock also have calcium
bearing
strata. Lots of generally acidic substrates also - Longarm
Quartzite, for
example. Jess has been focusing on the super productive and more
gently
sloping creeks north of the river, old-growth surveys
(shame-less self
promotion) documented 513 acres of old-growth on the south side
of the
river, adjacent to I-40. Lots to look at along the Pigeon River,
despite
the den of the highway.
Happy Solstice,
Josh
|
Re:
Groundhog Creek |
Jess
Riddle |
Dec
21, 2006 03:54 PST |
Bob,
No, right now I am thinking of Skiffley Creek and Dry Branch as
part
of the same site. Skiffley Creek seems to have similar
conditions,
just not be quite as productive as the adjacent Groundhog Creek
watershed. Without having seen the whole area, all of the
streams
radiating out from Big Bend on the Pigeon River would constitute
one
site to me.
Jess
|
RE:
Groundhog Creek |
Joshua
Kelly |
Dec
21, 2006 18:30 PST |
Bob,
That's a difficult question, because there are many sites I
haven't seen.
My perception is that there are many productive sites, probably
several in
each large watershed (>10,000 acres), however many of those
acres are not
being allowed to be forested, or forested to maturity. Of the
24,000 acres
of the Bald Mountain Roadless Area, perhaps just 3000 acres are
exemplary of
highly productive forests. Most of these sites do not have old
enough
forests to compete with tall tree sites in the Smokies. Sites
with 160'
tulip trees are rare, but there will be many more in the next 20
years as
most of these forests exceed 100 years of age. I think that only
further
exploration can provide a sufficient answer to your question. My
answer is
that there is a sizeable amount of productive land, and very
little of it
contains mature forest.
Happy Solstice,
Josh
|
|