Poets
Walk, NY |
Robert
Leverett |
May
30, 2006 06:42 PDT |
ENTS,
On Saturday, Holly Post, Monica Jakuc, and I went to a site
named the
Poet’s Walk which is located on the Hudson River near Red
Hook, NY. It
was supposed to be a location harboring big trees. But, the area
has
clay based soils, so tree height is not conspicuous in locations
that
would otherwise grow tall trees. The RHI might go to 85 feet at
Poets
Walk, but 90 is not even a reasonable dream. However, species
diversity
at Poet’s Walk is fairly high. I identified 29 species of
trees on a
2-mile roundtrip walk. Monica identified 20 species of birds and
said
she missed some. She identified 5 species of butterflies without
even
trying. But with respect to both fauna and flora, there were no
surprises.
While there wasn't anything to hoot about over either tree
height or
girth, there were very old chestnut oaks, white oaks, hemlocks,
and
black birches growing on the banks above the Hudson. In fact,
the old
white oaks appeared to be broadly scattered all over the
property. I
wouldn't flinch at ages in the 200 to 250 year age range and
possibly
some much older for isolated trees. The tree species list is as
follows:
N. red oak, swamp white oak, chestnut oak, white oak, American
basswood,
White ash, black birch, sugar maple, hop hornbeam, green ash,
white
pine, red maple, pitch pine, shagbark hickory, eastern red
cedar,
stahgorn sumac, black walnut (probably planted), black locust,
pignut
hickory, black cherry, witch hazel, dogwood, eastern hemlock,
American
elm, white birch, cucumber magnolia, American hornbeam, silver
maple,
and tuliptree. Absent from my list, but probably present on the
property
somewhere is American beech, black oak, and eastern cottonwood.
I
believe there are 32 or 33 species altogether on about 120
acres.
Scattered throughout the meadows was a lot of poison ivy.
Despite the let down on tall trees, the views within and across
the
meadows of the property are first rate. One looks across the
Hudson and
to the dreamy Catskills beyond. The scene is one of exquisite
beauty and
it is abundantly clear to see what so inspired the Hudson River
School
of Art artists. I would return over and over to the Poets Walk
for the
views alone. It has that quality. I think Holly intends to do
paintings
of the area.
On Sunday we visited the Pine Plains sycamore to begin the tree
modeling process. Monica positioned herself at the base of the
tree with
her paper and read and communed. Holly took digital images and
measured
the great tree’s stature. I fiddled with measuring equipment,
took some
preliminary measurements, and quickly came to the realization
that the
complicated Pine Plains sycamore is going to take at least 3
more
extended visits, and without a good sketch of the tree's
architecture to
identify what needs to be measured, what has been measured, and
what
needs to be re-measured, forget it. So, I switched gears and
made a
rough sketch of the trunk and big limbs and then resumed the
measuring
process. Later, Holly will make a more detailed, better scaled
drawing.
That assignment fits her well because she is an artist. BTW,
Holly lives
in historic Woodstock, NY, on the slope of the Catskills. Holly
has
plenty of relatives in Woodstock and she gave Monica and I a
semi-grand
tour on Sunday AM. It would have been a grand tour, but I was
fidgety
about getting to the Pine Plains sycamore. We got to the tree at
1:00PM,
so there was plenty of time, had I been better prepared.
I'll relate as much information as I gleaned from the first
measuring
exercise.
Total height: 114.7'
(individual measurements range
from 114.0 to 115.2 ft)
Girth at ground level: 28.0'
Girth at 4.5 feet: 26.5'
Girth at 6.3 feet: 27.3'
(The monocular gave the equivalent of 26.7' at the point of
observation.
The huge tree is thicker at right angles to the above
measurement. This
will give rise to a second set of measurements at right angles
to the
first.)
Average crown spread: 141.1'
Maximum spread: 146.0'
The point of separation of the limbs from the trunk where the
limbs are
clearly separate comes at approximately 12 feet above the base.
At just
below 12 feet where there is solid wood throughout, the diameter
of the
Pine Plains tree is over 10 feet. Probably 11. There are 5 huge
limbs.
The following information covers the measurements taken, plus an
estimated one.
Limb# Girth Where
1 13.3
(at start)
2 11.0
(at start)
3 9.1
(at start. Limb broken off long ago. remainder about
5 feet)
4 12.9
(about 5 feet above the point with trunk separation.
Separation point not visible from vantage point)
5 Not
measured (at least 12.5 feet)
The limbs of this great tree repeatedly divide. At 19 feet,
above the
first major division, limb #1 is still 12.6 feet around. At 26
feet up,
above a minor division, limb #4 is 11.7 feet around. There is a
lot of
wood in the Pine Plains sycamore.
Just eye-balling the tree, my guess is that its total trunk-limb
volume
is between 2300 and 2800 cubic feet. I suppose it is possible
that the
total trunk-limb volume could go a little higher than the 2800,
but I
really don't think so from discussions with Will of what kinds
of
dimensions lead to 3000 cubes and more. My best guess at this
point is
2400 cubes for the Pine Plains sycamore. Regardless, the Pine
Plains
Sycamore is one of the great Northeastern trees. And there are
so many
twists and turns and limb divisions that it challenges us to
measure it.
We will have to parse this tree into many parts and work on it
limb at a
time.
I look very forward to developing an accurate model of the Pine
Plains
sycamore. Its rural setting is ideal. The road by the cornfield
in which
it sets is not busy. One does not have to contend with gawkers,
traffic
noises, etc.
A big challenge in modeling huge, spreading trees altogether
from the
ground is that one must shift back and forth among multiple
locations to
get full visibility of each object being measured. The best plan
is to
first sketch the tree, decide on where to take measurements, and
to
number the points on the drawing. Then one simply chooses a
target and
sticks with it until it has been satisfactorily measured. The
first
target might be the lower trunk. There after, a short section of
one
limb to a point of separation is a logical next step. Areas of
limb
division are always problematic because of the changes in
curvature and
the changes in cross sectional form. Often there is a veritable
explosion of limbs from a common point, with one or more limbs
partially
hidden.
With all the variables to contend with, initially, it is easy to
feel
overwhelmed with the sheer magnitude of the measuring challenge.
One is
inclined to try to do too much at one time. A point worth
emphasizing is
that modeling huge spreading hardwoods is truly a world apart
from
modeling compact, columnar pines and hemlocks. If regular
geometric
shapes characterize forest-grown pines and hemlocks, the lack
there of
characterize the big spreading hardwoods. So, volume modeling of
the big
hardwoods can never be the province of simple log-oriented
forest
mensuration techniques that treat the object to be measured as a
composite of simple forms that lend themselves to a quick
averaging
process. Therefore, the newly spawned ENTS applied branch of
science
that we'll call dendromorphometry is poles apart from forest
mensuration. One cannot be substituted for the other. One is not
a
subset or superset of the other.
Bob
Robert T. Leverett
Cofounder, Eastern Native Tree Society
|
|