Palmaghatt
survey report |
David
Yarrow |
Jan
04, 2003 04:35 PST |
Palmaghatt
Ravine Survey
Minnewaska State Park
Second Survey Visit
November 9, 2002
Coordinator: David Yarrow
http://www.championtrees.org/oldgrowth/Palmaghatt/index.htm
Team 1
Leader: Fred Breglia
Assistant: Howard Stoner
Others: Jorge Gomes (park ranger), Lou Sebesta, Dorothy Evans (NYS
Natural Heritage Pgm), Rob Henry, David Hunt, Will Nixon, Tricia
& Bill Saville, Ned Barnard, Christina Cobb, Bob Miller
Datasheets: Howard Stoner, David Hunt
Team 2
Leader: Dean Fitzgerald
Assistant: Lisa Bozzuto
Others: Dan Karpen, Bruce Herforth, Bruce Kershner, Jerry
Horowitz, Jud Newborn, Anita & Michael Devine, Mark Gill,
Eleanor Vine, Gerald Davison, Dave & Barbara Deihl
Datasheets: Bruce Kershner
PHOTO REPORT: 47 photos organized into three webpages; slow download times.
Saturday, November 9, NYOGFA's Eastern New York Survey Team
conducted a second expedition into Palmaghatt Kill ravine. Park
Manager Tom Cobb authorized NYOGFA to go off trail into the
ravine for further scientific study. Otherwise, the ravine
remains a restricted area, with no trails, signs or publicity to
protect this fragile, encapsulated ecosystem from disturbance.
Our first encounter with the ravine was April 13, 2002, and we
were astonished at the ancient hemlock forest we found. After,
aerial photos of the ravine gave us an accurate, complete view
of the size, boundaries and diversity of ravine ecology. We
realized our 4/13 survey only saw the uppermost of several big
tree communities—and the first of five bogs. The aerial
photo gave us a realistic plan to scout the ravine, including a
new way to enter the ravine, and clear objectives for our second
scramble over the rocks and cliffs of this secluded sylvan
sanctuary.
After a few days of heavy rain and chill weather, this November
Saturday was warm—in the 50s—and partly sunny—better
for photos than April's damp, foggy day. Heavy rains two days
earlier had mostly dried out and drained away.
Two Teams
Communication failure with Western NY Survey leader Bruce
Kershner resulted in 25 people showing up for the survey—twice
the expected and desired size crew. Also present were ancient
forest activists from Ithaca-area, New York City and southern
New Jersey. The extra participants were organized into a second
survey team, led by Dean Fitzgerald, assisted by Lisa Bozzuto.
After a half hour of introductions and instructions by the Lake
Minnewaska parking lot, the two teams started the 1.5 mile hike
on carriage trails to the ravine. Each team had a different
assignment, and would traverse different terrain.
For the first time, NYOGFA's survey team was equipped with a GPS
unit. Team 1 had an extra member: Dorothy Evans, a professional
botanical survey technician from the NYS Natural Heritage
Program. Dorothy's GPS unit was no simple point locator, but a
sophisticated scientific data device. A fanny bag carried a
special antenna able to lock on to five satellite signals, even
in dense forest cover. The unit stores 1000 items of data for
direct download into a computer. The rugged, untracked ravine is
an ideal environment for such an instrument. In 2003, NYOGFA
will equip survey teams with simpler GPS units.
Survey Plan
Team 1 entered the ravine at its top—same as our 4/13
survey. Their mission was to explore the ravine's farther
(southeast) side, across the stream, along the high cliffs of
the upper ravine. The aerial photo suggested those southeast
slopes are rocky talus, with small trees and dense shrubs, with
few large trees. But small size often hides great age, and we
needed a complete assessment of the ecological communities in
the ravine. Team 1 would survey the least promising areas, with
a goal to reach the power line at the ravine's lower end by
lunch.
Team 2 hiked further down the carriage trail to enter the ravine
near the first bog, where the team emerged on 4/13. From Team
2's vantage point high on the ravine's edge, Team 1 was visible
far below in the bottom, threading around trees and over
boulders and logs. Team 2's mission was to explore the ravine's
northwest side, which, on the aerial photo, seemed to contain
the biggest trees. Team 2 had an easier route, and a more
promising forest to study. Its goal was to meet Team 1 at the
power line at the lower end of the ravine.
After lunch, both teams would double back up the northwest side
to collect data in the obvious area of old growth and giant
trees northwest of the second bog. The aerial photo hinted the
trees in this lower ravine were even larger than the hemlock
grove in the upper ravine explored on 4/13.
Team 2
Hopping and sliding down steep slopes of boulders and loose
debris, Team 2 reached the ravine bottom at the lower end of the
grove of large hemlocks explored on 4/13. The upper bog—the
final destination reached by the 4/13 survey—was a
hundred yards further down the ravine, and on the aerial photo
the largest trees were several hundred feet below that. Team 2
confirmed the forest in this upper ravine is a few centuries
old, dominated by dense, craggy Hemlock, with some Yellow Birch
and fewer Red Maple.
Signs of hemlock wooly adelgid invasion were again abundant.
Many hemlock twigs on the ground had stems coated with fuzzy,
white adelgid bodies slowly sucking the life out of the tree.
Many small saplings showed heavy adelgid infestation, and it
seems this ancient hemlock forest's future will be short—perhaps
another five years.
Team 2 divided in three, and scattered in the ravine. One group
backtracked up the ravine to search for an older hemlock with a
broken top.
Another group scouted the upper bog's edge, and found very old,
but not large, hemlocks. One hemlock Daniel Karpen saw growing
in the bog on a boulder is 500—perhaps 600—years
old.
A third group explored the steep talus slopes above the bog, but
found only smaller, stunted trees.
Team 2 Assistant Lisa Bozzuto filed <a href="Palmaghatt21109lb.htm">
a well-stated report</a> about this segment of the survey.
Unfortunately, she later was stranded above the lower cliffs,
and never made the descent to see the lower ravine and the
Gallery of Giants.
Convergence at The Crevice
Two Team 2 groups regrouped a hundred feet below the bog, with
little to report beyond smaller trees clearly centuries old.
Here, the stream makes a dramatic drop over a rocky face, broken
by a crevice strewn with tangled tumbles of massive boulders.
This steep crack in the cliffs is the only entry to the lower
ravine, which is lined by a second tier of towering cliffs—and
would be our only way out later.
Team 2 started to thread a trail down this narrow notch, hopping
from boulder to boulder. Team 1 appeared, having doubled back
from its hike along the southeast cliffs. A long line of hikers
snaked over and around giant rocks and tree falls, shimmying
along narrow ledges, descending the crevice, sinking below the
second tier of cliffs that isolate the lower ravine.
Team 1 had explored the far side terrain, passing through
several distinct ecological communities. The team hiked quickly
through the upper hemlock grove visited on 4/13. After leaving
that area, the team stopped to measure a few trees, and extract
tree ring cores to establish ages for average specimen trees.
The far side is largely rugged talus fields of large boulders,
with thin (or no) soil and acid water—a harsh environment
unable to grow large trees. Many areas are tangled thickets of
mountain-laurel, rhododendron, holly, witch hazel, and
mountain-ash. Other areas are dominated by small to moderate
size hemlocks. Extensive thick mats of moss and beds of ferns
cover exposed surfaces, and moss has crept up many tree trunks.
A few large White Pine grow below the cliffs. Otherwise,
hemlocks dominate these communities, with some Yellow Birch and
Red Maple. Black Tupelo are in wet areas. An American Chestnut
was found; its deep bark fissures suggested advanced age for the
small tree. But most trees and shrubs are stunted by the thin,
poor, rocky soil and acid waters.
A small cave was found—a potential bear dean—and
bear scat was found. Likely the ravine provides a secluded
habitat for black bear. We saw nothing of the turkey vultures
that were soaring over the ravine in April.
The Lower Ravine
Eventually, Team 1 progress was blocked by a high cliff
overlooking the lower ravine. Below them, the team saw a deeper
ravine with a mixed hardwood community of giant trees. The
second bog was visible down the ravine from this high vantage
point. But with no way down the high, vertical cliff, the team
turned back up the ravine, seeking a place to descend the cliff
to reach the lower ravine. Team 1 met Team 2 just as it was
descending The Crevice.
After a hundred yards, The Crevice widened and leveled somewhat,
although still very confined. There, at the upper end of a grove
of giant trees, we paused for lunch and reports. After lunch,
the same teams reformed. Team 1 traveled the bottom of the
ravine along the stream. Team 2 went upslope, along the towering
cliffs.
The slope is gentler, so more duff and debris accumulates to
form soft soil and fill cracks between boulders. But even here,
care was required, lest a hiker suddenly plunge knee or hip deep
in a hidden gap between rocks. Several team members stepped into
such a surprise, but none seriously hurt. The worst got bangs,
bruises and scrapes. At several spots, we heard water cascading
under the rocky debris.
Hardwood Diversity
Trees grow better in the thicker, moister soil, sheltered by two
tiers of cliffs. The ragged forest canopy soars to well over 100
feet. Yet, these tall trees are dwarfed by the cliffs confining
us in the ravine. In this rugged, uneven terrain, measuring
trees—especially height—is challenging, both
physically and mathematically.
Hemlocks are less dominant, with many hardwood species: Sugar
Maple, Tuliptree, Northern Red Oak, American Beech, Black
Cherry, Yellow Birch, Black Birch, White Birch, and White Ash.
Many trees are huge for their species, and display ancient bark
that indicates ages of several centuries. An American Chestnut
was found with nearly three foot diameter which, though long
dead, was still standing—a rare find in any eastern
forest.
This greater diversity will assure a smoother, less catastrophic
transition as hemlocks die of adelgid infestation.
Gallery of Giants
This Gallery of Giants is filled with so many dramatic,
attractive specimens. Very large specimens of each species were
found. They grow straight up for several dozen feet without
branching, indicating ancient giants grew in a mature forest in
which they had to climb and reach for light above an already
high canopy.
However, trees are not exceptional in height. Few were much more
than 100 feet tall. The tallest trees measured was a Hemlock at
121.5 feet, and a Black Cherry at 104 feet. But few trees exceed
100 feet in height. A future survey will have to make more tree
height measurements in this Gallery of Giants to assess more
carefully the canopy of this forest.
Seems despite the shelter provided by the two tiers of cliffs in
the deep ravine, other factors limit the trees' vertical growth
potential. The principal growth restriction seems to be the lack
of soil, which may make moisture uneven and unreliable.
Possibly, too, the rocky environment subjects the trees to
extremes of summer heat and winter cold.
Most trees display the most ancient bark we've seen anywhere in
New York, making them difficult to identify by bark alone. Many
exhibit extremes of bizarre growth, including stilted roots as
thick as ordinary trunks, and large roots twisting and snaking
over and around boulders. These signs indicate not only are the
trees old growth, but the forest is far more ancient.
These signs of advanced age heightened our appreciation for this
extra-ordinay place. The air filled with excited talk and
exclamations as teams wandered from giant to giant, measuring
height and girth, taking photos, estimating age. Again, the
ravine exceeded our expectations.
The short afternoon went quickly gathering data on these
extra-ordinary trees. The late date in the year meant darkness
descended early, and we didn't want to stumble through this
rugged, rocky ravine in the dark. So we had to forego reaching
the power line in the lowest end of the ravine and inspecting
other notable tree communities. Team 2 began to scramble back up
the crevice into the lower ravine, while Team 1 made a rapid
ramble down to the second bog to scout the terrain and note
further tree conditions. Team 2 found where Palmaghatt Kill
leaves the second bog in a deep, rocky channel, and then hurried
up and out of the Gallery of Giants and the Crevice in the
gathering twilight.
Postscript: Ice Storm
One week after our survey, a major weather disturbance struck
the Shawangunk forest. Beginning early morning on Nov. 16, 2.9
inches in rain and ice, then 1.7 inches of snow fell on the
Shawangunk Ridge in a 47 hour period. At Mohonk Preserve, staff
measured ice as thick as 7/8 of an inch surrounding tree limbs.
Many trees suffered significant damage from this ice burden—the
worst at Mohonk since a 1942 ice storm.
Oaks, with still leaves still clinging, were the most damaged.
Many hemlock were also lost limbs, snapped in mid-trunk, or were
uprooted completely. At Minnewaska, many miles of carriage roads
and hiking trails were blocked by fallen tree debris. One
resident of the Gunks who toured the Ridge commented, "It
looked like someone went along with a weed whacker and chopped
off the tops of them."
The head ranger at the Mohonk Preserve said, "It's
throughout the whole forest. The whole forest has been
substantially changed by this."
We have no information how much damage occurred to the ancient
forest and tall trees in the Palmaghatt Kill ravine. The next
survey will have to assess the impact of this ice storm on the
ravine's ecosystems.
David Yarrow
Turtle EyeLand Sanctuary
44 Gilligan Road, East Greenbush, NY 12061
518-477-6100; fax 477-1346
www.championtrees.org
www.championtrees.org/NYOGFA/
www.championtrees.org/yarrow/ |
Palmaghatt
Ravine |
Howard
Stoner |
Nov
11, 2003 07:56 PST |
Here is the report on our most recent survey in the Palmaghatt
Revine a
section of Minnewaska State Park near New Paltz NY.
E. Hemlock 12.2' cbh 109'
Tulip 10.2' cbh 108'
B. Cherry 8.4' cbh 100'
A. Beech 7.2' cbh 93'
NR Oak 8.0' cbh 91.8'
G. Ash 9.7' cbh 85.8'
R. Maple 5.4' cbh 84.8'
Y. Birch 4.2' 80.0'
B. Birch 3.6' 77.3'
Chestnut Oak 3.6' cbh 65.8'
Rucker Index of 89.6
Howard |
|