ENTS,
I finally found my latest copy of New Jersey's big tree
list/booklet. It's from 1998. Up though that list NJ's only
criterion for measurement of big trees was the circumference. The
booklet says that they were going to switch to the AFA measurement
criteria for 1999 and forword. So I was reading through the list
last night. I found several trees listed in places where I've been,
but never knew there was a champion tree there. I also found two
that I have seen and photographed.
Anyway, the champion Eastern Red Cedar has a circumference of 9'7",
and is in the front yard of a church that I have photographed. I
never noticed it. So I need to go back there some day. But when I
read how big that tree was, I remembered a tree on one of the golf
courses where I work. I knew that tree was much bigger, at least in
circumference. I photographed it a couple years ago, and need to
find that photo. I took my father's long measuring tape to work with
me, and walked out to the tree after work. To my horror it had been
cut down!! Part of the stump is about 2 feet high, and part of it is
about 3 feet high. So I measured the stump below the lowest cut. The
trunk didn't flare out at the bottom anyway, so this is pretty
accurate. I measure it to be 11'11" ! This tree was a casualty of
the reckless and pointless cutting that they've been doing for
several years now, that I described in an earlier post in these
forums. What a tragic loss. I'm glad
that I at least have a photo of it. I will have to find it and scan
it.
Barry
Continued at:
http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees/browse_thread/thread/65c38311991b4b5c?hl=en
|