Trout
brook, MTSF |
John
Eichholz |
Mar
27/28, 2004 18:42 PST |
Bob, et. al.:
Today I started exploring in the Trout brook basin, across Route
2 from
the Todd-Clark range. I came across some good growing regions
and a new
species for me, red spruce. The spruce was in a pure stand near
where
Trout brook forks. The pine was near the highway, and the whole
stand
looks very promising and quite young. It was nice to find
another black
cherry over 110'. Here is a list:
species height CBH
Black Cherry 111.8 4.4
Black Cherry 108.1 4.1
Black Cherry 106.2 3.9
Black Cherry 104.3 4.5
Black Cherry 104.1 6.6
Black Cherry 102.3 3.5
Eastern Hemlock 122.9
Eastern Hemlock 114.0
Norway spruce 117.1'.
Norway Spruce 115.1 4.8
Norway Spruce 97.3 3.8
White Ash 137.8 7.9
White Ash 126.0 7.8
White Pine 144.2 8
Yellow Birch 89.2 3.8
John |
Trout
brook |
John
Eichholz |
Apr
02, 2004 14:45 PST |
Bob, Gary, John:
I have been doing some research on tip mapping as a way to test
and
correlate measurements. I went out to Trout brook to remeasure
the tall
white pine there. I had only taken one, quick reading last week,
as I
was eager to get up the drainage. From above the tree, it was
apparent
there was a nested top, with at least four distinct tips. I
eliminated
one as low, then investigated the other three. The results are
below.
I think it is fair to say these results support our ability to
map
individual tips, and to correlate "one yard"
differences with tip areas.
I also looked into the interpoint program that Gary described. I
have
the executable loaded and am playing around with his data and
his data
with varying perturbations applied to it. I would like to see if
it is
useful for mapping widely spaced trees using a rangefinder.
The Trout brook lower basin has a small but fast growing grove
of pines
and some decent hemlock as well, with a light understory of red
maple
and yellow birch. This grove lies just above route 2, adjacent
to Trout
brook. Above there, lies a more typical hardwood forest for
MTSF. I
measured several white pine above 140', including one above
150'. The
hemlocks I found are mostly between 100' and 110' tall. Here is
today's
list:
species hgt CBH
White Pine 150.7 8.2
White Pine 145.8 7.1
White Pine 141.4 5.9
White Pine 141.2 9.4
E. Hemlock 110.7 5.6
and the tip readings:
tr_k DATE DCROWN DBASE ACROWN ABASE ADD height tip
208 3/27/2004 60 36 56.6 -3.2 0 144.24 ?
208 4/2/2004 55 33 53.6 10 0.7 150.69 1
208 4/2/2004 64 52 35.6 14.2 0.9 150.93 1
208 4/2/2004 63 52 35.8 14 0.9 149.19 4
208 4/2/2004 63 49 36.4 14.4 0.9 149.61 4
208 4/2/2004 61 47 38.4 14.4 0.9 149.63 4
208 4/2/2004 60 47 38.4 14.4 0.9 147.77 2
208 4/2/2004 57 41 43 14.6 0.9 148.52 2
(The column headings probably don't line up.)
John |
John
Strikes Again |
Robert
Leverett |
May
05, 2004 09:51 PDT |
ENTS:
Super-Ent John Eichholz recently struck again
when he confirmed a
122-foot Norway spruce in the Trout Brook section of MTSF.
John's tree
is second tallest of its species we've measured in
Massachusetts.
The distribution of the number of species by
height class in Mohawk
is now as follows. The list includes non-native as well as
native
species.
Hgt No.
160 1
150 1
140 2
130 6
120 12
110 19
100 23
90 24
We have 5 trees over 160, 61 trees over 150,
and 187 over 140. We
haven't gotten all over 140 yet. That number should be around
200, if
not slightly more.
Bob
|
Re:
John Strikes Again |
John
Eichholz |
May
08, 2004 08:16 PDT |
Bob:
Super-Ent? I think I'll leave that title for Will, Lee,
yourself, or
many of the others who have contributed so much.
For the record, the Norway spruce stand is a small plantation
growing in
one of MTSF's high growth areas. The area is a bench below a
steep
slope, and the tallest one is growing right near running water.
Near it
grows a 118' one and one at 106', 2.7' cbh (123 h/d ratio).
There are
several at least in the one-teens. You had said the stand dates
from
the CCC days, which seems right, and it is growing very well.
The
eventual height limit of Norway spruce in this stand could very
well
exceed 130'. Who knows? We'll just have to wait and see.
John
|
New
Record Norway Spruce |
dbhg-@comcast.net |
Sep
11, 2004 15:18 PDT |
ENTS:
Today John Sternala and I canvassed the Trout
Brook area of Mohawk Trail State Forest and we didn't come away
empty handed. A hemlock measuring 125.2 feet in height and 7.9
feet around started us off on the right foot. But we spent most
of our time in an old Norway Spruce plantation, one that I had
visited several times in the past. My best previous height
measurement was slightly over 118 feet. John Eichholtz
subsequently set the Mohawk record with a 122.2 ft tall, 4.1 ft
around Norway. The state record was a 123.8-footer in Egremont,
MA. Well, not any more. Today we measured to splendid Norways
and a white pine:
Species Height Circumference
Norway Spruce 121.1 5.8
Norway Spruce 126.2 5.7
(new state champ)
White Pine 141.2 10.3
Bob
|
Re:
New Record Norway Spruce |
John
Eichholz |
Sep
12, 2004 20:37 PDT |
Dale, Bob:
As I remember the stand, 5'+ on circumference is actually rather
high
for the stand. I don't remember the spacing, but the stand is
now quite
dense and pure Norway Spruce. It is on a wide bench about 50'
above
Trout Brook, so it is a flat site, and with a steep rocky face
above it.
There are a couple of brooks that meander through the stand. The
tallest
trees I measured were right beside one of these brooks. Bob,
didn't you
think the Norway Spruce stands in MTSF were CCC plantings from
the 1930's?
There is a really nice grouping of White Pine in the same
general area,
which is fairly far up the brook. I found two over 140' when I
looked:
One at 145.6'h, 11.4'cbh, another at 144.3'h, 9.2'cbh. Also,
137.3'h,
11.7'cbh. This little stand is one of the most charming in MTSF
in my
opinion, perhaps because of the rugged terrain and the apparent
age of
the trees. Stone walls intersect it, there are rocky outcrops
nearby,
and Trout Brook rushes by below. Being right off the road which
climbs
beside Trout Brook and so close to the spruce plantation, it
must be an
interesting story why these trees were saved...
John
|
Trout
Brook |
john-@bcn.net |
Nov
02, 2004 15:45 PST |
Bob,
Will, Jess:
After my walk today in the Trout Brook basin I would agree. The
noble ash reaches a
pinnacle of sorts in there.
As I entered the basin I rechecked the lower pine area. The
151.4'h x 8.1'c one is
the tallest found so far but there is a 148' and a couple over
140' also. These are
young pines growing in an extremely favorable site. Barring
misfortune, the
tallest one should exceed 160' in the next decade or two.
Travelling upstream, a tall 121.5' basswood caught my eye. This
led me to cross the
stream and enter an area I had ignored before, but which turned
out to be a classic
example of a high growth boulder field, with moss and ferns
covering the boulders and
fallen logs. It reminds me more of Dunbar Brook than the boulder
field at the base of
Todd mountain, but the average age of trees is lower. The canopy
was almost entirely
hardwoods, dominated by white ash, yellow birch and black birch,
with some beech,
sugar maple and red maple.
On the slope, I measured an American Beech to 118.8', which
surprised me. Beech in that
height class are rare in MTSF. I next measured a red maple to
111.7' and another very attractive beech to 105.7'
This was followed by a series of the nicest white ash I have
encountered. They are growing on a bench above the brook, at the
base of the boulder
field. The bench is wide enough to have good soil depth and long
enough to fit lots
of trees. I measured three ash over 130' and there are many over
120' Most of them
are young, with circumferences in the 4' to 6' range, although
there are several in the
7' to 8' range.
Across the brook I measured a hemlock to 120.7' Farther upstream
was a hemlock to
126.1', which I think has been reported before. I also found a
beautiful, perfectly
formed hemlock growing in a thick patch of hemlock on the slope
above the brook.
This led me to a grove of ash trees I have had my eye on. They
are growing thickly in a
bouldery cove above the brook and are hard to measure. I
measured one to 133.7', and
another nearby to 126.8'. I was then surprised by a black birch
at 109.3'. The
capstone of the day followed, a white ash that climbed to 142.4'
with a circumference
of 8.0'.
The Trout brook basin now has three state height champions
(Norway spruce, black
cherry and yellow birch) a runner up (sugar maple), white pine
above 150', white ash
above 140', sugar maple above 130', and a great depth of other
species. Missing from
the canopy but present elsewhere in MTSF are bitternut hickory
and bigtooth aspen. Red
oak is present, but not to great heights. My records show
a Rucker index of 126.5 in
an area that does not exceed 150 acres. What else is in there?,
one has to wonder.
Top ten list I am aware of:
White pine 151.5'
White ash 142.4'
Sugar maple 132.0'
Norway Spruce 127'+
Eastern hemlock 126.1'
Black cherry 125'
Am. basswood 121.5'
Am. Beech 118.8'
Red maple 111.7'
(should go higher)
Black birch 109.3'
Rucker index 126.5
Today's list:
WP 140.0' 9.4'c
WP 151.5' 8.1'c
BW 121.5' 4.9'c (one of a triple)
AB 118.8' 7.3'c
AB 105.7' 6.8'c
RM 111.7' 6.4'c
WA 111.9' skinny
WA 123.4'
WA 119.2'
WA 134.0' 6.3'c
WA 132.6' 7.2'c
WA 127.3' 4.5'c
WA 126.2' skinny
WA 126.2' fat
WA 131.6' 5.1'c
WA 133.7' 7.0'c
WA 126.8'
WA 142.4' 8.0'c
EH 120.7' 7.1'c
EH 126.1' 6.7'c
EH 123.9' 7.0'c
BB 105.2'
BB 109.3' 5.0'c
That was the most fun I have had tree hunting in many moons.
John
|
Re:
The noble ash tree |
dbhg-@comcast.net |
Nov
02, 2004 18:50 PST |
John:
Totally awesome! WAY COOL! Good job.
Yes, Trout Brook may we have the greatest potential of all the
areas of MTSF. There are a few bigtooths farther up the stream
and some down stream on the other side. I measured one to about
108 feet a couple of years ago. I think we can go 110 or 112.
Also, I'm sure we can find a few bitternuts - maybe on the other
side of Trout Brook.
The Rucker index of an area of about 125
acres as I trace in on the map may reach 127 with a couple of
years. And it is young stuff. If we're going to find a 150-foot
white ash in New England within the next decade, it may well be
in Trout Brook.
I'm looking at November 20th or 21st to begin
another sweep of Trout Brook. Are you available? If you send me
the angle measures and distances for the trees, I'll pump them
into the database and then send you a spreadsheet of all the
trees we have for Trout Brook.
In terms of the tree competition, we
have 13 white ash trees in MTSF above 140 feet. That'as tops in
the Northeast. The white ash rules.
Bob
|
Rethinking
application of the Rucker Index |
Robert
Leverett |
Nov
03, 2004 06:00 PST |
ENTS:
Will Blozan's and John Eichholz'a recent
confirmations of more
exceptional trees in the Trout Brook region of Mohawk Trail
State Forest
suggests the need to begin the process of breaking down our
large,
mainly political units, such as national parks, state forests,
conservation properties etc. into sub-sites that are delineated
more
through ecologically derived criteria than convenient political
ones. We
all knew this was coming, but I do believe that the time has
arrived.
The Trout Brook cove in MTSF includes about
125 acres of prime
growing habitat that includes similar geology, climate etc. I
think Lee
Frelich would describe much of the forest type in Trout Brook as
mature,
even-aged, grading into old growth on the steep upper slopes. In
addition most of the forest on the lower slopes has a fairly
common
human disturbance history. It seems reasonable that Trout Brook
should
have its own Rucker index.
One undeniable fact is that the Trout
Brook area is very rich for
growing trees. The Rucker index for a 125-acre Trout Brook
sub-site now
stands at 127.5 and can likely go just a little higher. In 20 or
30
years, the index will climb to between 129 and 130, barring loss
of
species.
On the north side of route #2, the
Todd-Clark ridge gives rise to a
200-acre swath of forest that has a Rucker index of around 132.
The area
has swaths of older forest and probably represents climax
vegetative
development in terms of tree height growth for any area in
Massachusetts. The area has the same geology and climate. It too
logically should have its own Rucker index.
As we expand the geographical area,
naturally we increase the Rucker
index, but it is interesting to follow how well the hot spots
like Trout
Brook and Clark ridge fair, i.e. to assess their contributions.
With the
latest numbers cranked in, MTSF's Rucker index still stands at
134.5,
courtesy of this past weekends measurement of the Jake tree. So,
going
from 200 acres to 6770 yields an increase of only 2.5 points
with
respect to the Clark ridge site. Darned impressive.
Expanding to include significantly
larger, more diverse areas that
would eliminate the dominance of a local geology, topography,
climate,
and forest history and then telescoping down to small regions to
investigate the patterns will be grist for the cold days of
winter spent
indoors at my computer. However, this I can already see. A few
small,
contiguous, compact areas will continue to account for most of
the tall
tree contributions. I would have once thought that the more
searching I
did the more spread out the locations of each of the champions
would be.
I never actually expected that 2 or 3 compact areas would
continue to
contribute so much to the Rucker index calculations.
It will take a lot more roaming around and
sampling to adequately
validate this pattern, but I can't think of anything I'd rather
be
doing. So many trees, so little time ......
Bob
Robert T. Leverett
Cofounder, Eastern Native Tree Society
|
Trout
Brook |
dbhg-@comcast.net |
Nov
04, 2004 18:56 PST |
ENTS:
The flurry of e-mails about the Rucker index
being applied to sub-sites of larger sites has a perfect test
case in the Trout Brook cove of MTSF. So far building the Rucker
index for Trout Book has been a real cooperative ENTS effort.
Here is a summary of the latest numbers.
Species Height Measurer Comments
White pine 151.9 Bob
Leverett (John Eichholz got 151.4)
White ash 142.4 John
Eichholz
Sugar maple 132.0 Will
Blozan
Hemlock 126.1 John
Eichholz
Black cherry 125.4 Will
Blozan State
record
Red maple 121.8 Will
Blozan
A. basswood 121.5 John
Eichholz 2nd tallest in state
A. beech 118.8 John
Eichholz
Bitternut H. 118.3 Bob
Leverett
Black birch 111.7 John
Eichholz
Rucker index = 127.0 for native species
==============================================
Other species
Norway spruce 127.1 Bob
Leverett State
record
Bigtooth aspen 107.4 Bob
Leverett
N. red oak 105.8 Bob
Leverett
Yellow birch 102.9 Will
Blozan State
record
The potential for Trout Brook may exceed all
other Mohawk sites including the incomparable Todd-Clark ridge,
north side.
Trout Brook has a number of hemlocks in the
120+ class and similarly with sugar maples. The site is deep in
tall white ash trees, with two over 140. To be truly complete,
we have to record some heights for white birch, hop hornbeam,
and higher up on Hawks Mtn we can bag a red spruce or two. It
will be fun to develop very complete stats for Trout Brook. It
is a compact enough area to do a good job. We can extend the
area of tall tree habitat to about 180 acres.
Bob
|
More
Trout Brook |
dbhg-@comcast.net |
Nov
05, 2004 04:19 PST |
ENTS:
To
take the Trout Brook sub-site a step further, the watershed of
Trout Brook and its sister stream form a cove that opens to the
northeast. Elevations range from 1970 down to 590 feet for a
range of 1380 feet. The entire watershed encompasses 1192 acres
and the linear path of the divide is 7.1 miles. Within the 1192
acres, there are around 50 to 60 of old growth - maybe slightly
more. There is also about 180 acres of highly productive forest.
The Rucker index stands at 127.6 for all species and 127.0 for
native species. The forest is relatively young and has 25 to as
much as 50 years of good growing left to do before mortality,
crown damge, etc. begins to reverse the overall upward
develoment of its vertical structure. We have an ideal forest
laboratory with clear boundaries to observe the growth of
sixteen or seventeen species.
I think that hemlock and white pine have
the greatest unrealized potential. Hemlock will eventually
surpass 130 feet and white pine will reach 160. Can white ash
make 150? That's the big question.
Bob
|
More
Trout Brook Goodies |
dbhg-@comcast.net |
Nov
07, 2004 17:13 PST |
Will,
John Eichholz, Dale, et al:
Today, John Knuerr and I remeasured the white
ash that I'd been touting as a 140-footer, but got numbers from
139 to 141. We went well up the ridge until the angle to the
crown was only 17 degrees. We could see the highest branches.
Both of us shot the tree and got consistent results. The tree is
140.2 feet tall. It just makes the club. I also found a new
white ash at 134.2 x 8.0.
Later I went to the other side of Trout Brook
and checked on Big Bertha's carcus. Yes, she croaked. Two trees
in her vicinity are doing well though. The first is 145.6 x 10.2
and the second is 140.3 x 12.1. Yes, the second pine is huge. I
also got a red oak ast 110.8 x 6.1. That's the best I've done
fro oak in the Trout Brook drainage. So far the stats for Trout
Brook are:
1. Tallest tree: WP 151.9 x 8.2
2. Tallest hardwood: WA 142.4 x 8.0
3. # species breaking height thresholds:
Criteria Number
>=100 14
>=120 8
>=130 3
>=140 2
>=150 1
4. # state records: 2 (
NS and YB)
5. Rucker index: 127.0 for
native species, 127.6 for all species
There is a lot of searching left to do.e
can beat the current record for northern red oak. Somewhere in
the upper cove there will be a 100-foot red spruce.
Bob
|
|