Sweet
Taste of Victory |
Robert
Leverett |
Sep
21, 2006 12:54 PDT |
ENTS,
This morning witnessed was one of the great
moments of my life. I
attended a meeting hosted by the Dept of Fish and Game and the
Department of Conservation and Recreation at the Jug End Nature
Preserve
in the Taconics. The meeting was to announce the establishment
of
100,000 acres of medium and large scale forest reserves in
Massachusetts. That is approximately 20% of the total area of
our public
forests. Nine reserves were created and one (get ready) includes
part of
Mohawk Trail, Savoy Mountain, and Monore State Forests. The
reserve sets
aside 7,100 acres as completely protected, and to my amazement,
follows
the exact boundaries that Chief Forester Jim DiMaio and I
tentatively
established back in June. Basically, Jim handed me the pencil
and I
dutifully went to work. The boundaries held. The excitement of
having
been privileged to have personally drawn the boundaries of this
wonderful reserve has not yet fully sunk in. I think I'm going
to
celebrate tonight. Sweetie Pie has something of a cold, so we
won't
paint the town red, but we can at least have a small celebration. I
guess the big one needs to be on Oct 28th, huh?
Our last major effort to establish
forest reserves in Mohawk was in
1996. It failed a slow death due to internal bickering inside
then DEM.
Some of us have been pushing for reserves of one form or another
since
the late 1980s. So, this is a dream come true. No longer will I
have to
work overtime thinking of ways to keep public attention on
Mohawk
without compromising its sensitive old growth areas. Mohawk is
finally
safe. Yeeehaaa! The big wigs from Boston who attended and
presided made
it all official. I also had the opportunity to talk to
Commissioner
Steve Burrington on the Robinson State Park Timber sale. He
wants to
work out a compromise. How sweet it is. How sweet it is.
On the way to the meeting I
stopped at Ice Glen and communed with
some old friends. When in the Glen, I always visit a particular
white
ash. It is a beauty. This morning it received its formal ENTS
name
"Monarch of the Glen". Guess where that name came
from? Well, of course
I had to remeasure the Monarch. Its revised statistics are:
Hgt: 138.4 ft
Cir: 11.2 ft (conservative)
This is one great white ash tree,
folks. Its 42.8-inch diameter is
very high on the list of ashes with a 100 % forest-grown shape
in New
England. There a re a few larger ones, but not many. So three
cheers for
the Monarch of the Glen.
I had time for one other
measurement and chose a trailside pine.
The trail's close passing obscures the height of the tree. I
eventually
found the top at 148.1 feet above the base. Its 7.8-foot girth
is hardly
noticeable in Ice Glen. What a great place!
I returned to work only
about tqo hours ago. Think I'll leave
early today. I need to celebrate.
Bob
|
Re:
Sweet Taste of Victory |
LISA
BOZZUTO |
Sep
21, 2006 13:17 PDT |
Bob,
That is wonderful news -
your years of dedication have been rewarded!. Do you have a map
of where the boundary lines are?
Lisa
|
Re:
Sweet Taste of Victory |
Lee
Frelich |
Sep
21, 2006 16:13 PDT |
Bob:
Well that makes two victories in two days. Reinstatement of the
Clinton
Roadless Rule yesterday gave Minnesota 62,000 of reserves as
well (not to
mention the hundreds of thousands of acres in VA, NC, SC, WV,
etc.).
|
Webmaster Note:
News: The Roadless Rule will be reinstated
nationwide under a U.S. District Court Judge ruling
today.
In Wilderness Society v U.S. Forest Service, Judge
Elizabeth LaPorte of the U.S. District Court Northern
District of California ruled that:
"The State Petitions Rule is set aside and the
Roadless Rule ... is
reinstated. Defendants are enjoined from taking any
further action
contrary to the Roadless Rule without undertaking
environmental analysis consistent with this
opinion."
In short, Judge Laporte ruled that the Bush
Administration violated the National Environmental
Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act when it
repealed the 2001 Roadless Rule. The court reinstated
the 2001 Rule nationwide and enjoined any management
activity contrary to the Rule,
except in the Tongass National Forest. The court did not
extend the Rule's protections to the Tongass because the
Bush Administration had previously exempted the Tongass
through a lawsuit settlement with the State of Alaska.
http://www.wilderness.org/NewsRoom/Statement/20060920.cfm
|
I hope your tornadoes are as delicate and tactful as ours, and
they gently
thread their way around the reserves.
Lee
|
Re:
Sweet Taste of Victory |
wad-@comcast.net |
Sep
21, 2006 23:03 PDT |
Bob,
Congrats!! That's big news. I am glad to see your hard work paid
off with such bounty.
Scott
|
RE:
Sweet Taste of Victory |
Will
Blozan |
Sep
21, 2006 23:05 PDT |
SWEET! You are the "champion" of the Mass forests. So,
Bob, we are all dying
to know, what is the Rucker Index of the "Leverett Forest
Preserve".
A big high-five!
Will
|
RE:
Sweet Taste of Victory |
Robert
Leverett |
Sep
22, 2006 07:41 PDT |
Scott,
Thanks. The road to victory has been a long
one, which has made the
taste all the sweeter. When I retire from my present position
with
Sisters of Providence Health Systems, I'm thinking about writing
a book
about the modern old growth movement in the East. The movement
has many
chapters.
Eastern old growth research has its
origins as far back as 1913. And
along the way, there have been stellar performers like E. Lucy
Braun. In
more recent times the scientists from institutions like the
University
of Wisconsin paved the way for a deeper understanding of old
growth
ecosystems. Lee Frelich emerged from that group. In the
Northeast,
Charlie Cogbill up in Vermont made significant contributions to
old
growth definitions. The U.S. Forest Service made some highly
significant
contributions during a period when the organization seemed to be
split
between those advocating a traditional timber focus and a more
foresighted group advocating a broader ecosystem
management-based
approach.
Because of an entrenched timber focus in
government forestry
agencies and the schools of forestry, much of the eastern old
growth
forest research in the middle years stayed buried in archives.
The
prevailing ideas about old growth in the institutions just
mentioned was
that of over-mature forests with the timber largely going to
waste. I
was in the inside of many debates and well know the mindset. But
the
early 1990s witnessed an explosion of interest within the
activist part
of the environmental-scientific community in identifying and
preserving
what survived as old growth in the East. The impetus was in part
the
conflict over old growth in the Pacific Northwest. It was in
this period
that the "Wild Earth" Publication came into existence
and along with its
associated eastern old growth inventory became an important
vehicle for
greater public involvement. Most significantly, in 1993, The
Ancient
Eastern Forest Conference Series was born from the developing
interest
in eastern old growth and the conference series brought together
separate parties that had an interest or investment in eastern
old
growth. From 1993 to 1999, the conference series served as an
important
crucible for building academic interest in further old growth
research
in the forests of the East.
After 1999, the subject appear to have quieted down for several
years in the activist circles. That wasn't really the case. What
was
actually happening was that a union of government, academia,
forestry,
and environmental groups were acting cooperatively and moving to
incorporate old growth into reserves of one type or another. TNC,
the
Natural Heritage Programs, grassroots environmental
organizations, and
others were heavily involved. What is now emerging in the way of
protection for old growth results from the results of the
morphing of
early movements into more serious scientific ventures aimed at
protecting bio-diversity on a grander scale.
Several current ENTS members have great
involvement in these early
eastern old growth movements. Foremost among the vocal members
of this
list are Will Blozan, Lee Frelich, and myself. Other ENTS
members/affiliates include David Stahle, John Okeefe, Charlie
Cogbill,
and Don Bertolette. There is a host of newer members who I think
are
destined to play extremely important roles.
Scientists/naturalists like
Tom Diggins, Tony D'Amato, Dave Orwig, Neil Pederson, Don Bragg,
Bob Van
Pelt, Roman Dial, Rick Van de Poll, Dale Luthringer, Ed Frank,
and
yourself to name a few. The list is long.
Bob
|
Sweet
Taste of Victory/ more work to do |
Lee
E. Frelich |
Sep
22, 2006 09:18 PDT |
Bob:
Now that your big victory is reality, its time to start on the
next step.
Does MA DCR have policies in place to govern the response to
major natural
disturbances? Inevitably another hurricane like 1938, a
thunderstorm,
tornado, or forest fire will occur and reinitiate new forest on
these
lands. To see how the forests respond to natural disturbance is
one of the
most important aspects of large-scale reserves.
Once you have large reserves, issues like salvage of downed
timber, salvage
of diseased timber (HWA for example), assessment of fire risk
posed by
downed and diseased timber, authorization of use of motorized
vehicles and
other equipment in emergencies, minimum tools analyses, safety
of
surrounding settlements during and after natural disturbances,
become
important, and if you are not prepared, decisions that lead to
damage of
the reserves will occur during emergencies. There is the issue
of
prescribed burns to restore natural fire regimes in certain
forest types,
which is also related to safety of surrounding settlements.
NTFPs
(Non-timber forest products) remains a significant issue
(harvest of
conifer boughs for wreaths, mushrooms and berries for food,
decorative
ferns and clubmosses, deer hunting and management, etc.). We've
dealt with
these issues plenty in MN. My advice is to make sure you are
ready for all
of them.
Lee
|
Re:
Sweet Taste of Victory |
Jess
Riddle |
Sep
22, 2006 15:38 PDT |
Bob,
That's spectacular news! Congratulations! Now you've just got to
go
around to each tree to tell them they don't have to worry
anymore.
Jess
|
RE:
Sweet Taste of Victory |
Matthew
Hannum |
Sep
22, 2006 15:45 PDT |
Congratulations!
This is a big victory for everyone who loves the woods and who
benefit
from them (which ironically includes everyone, even the people
who'd
sooner pave the planet and put in malls everywhere because they
don't
know better or don't care.)
Your hard work has paid off, and that is a wonderful thing to
see!
|
Re:
Sweet Taste of Victory |
Fores-@aol.com |
Sep
22, 2006 16:09 PDT |
Bob:
I am truly impressed with the progress you reported today. I
think that
such a move could be extremely important to forest management on
private
property by taking such a large portion of the Mass.
"timber pool" off the table and
one result may be that some of the scientific and environmental
issues that
Joe Zorzin has repeatedly brought up relative to timber mining
become more
widely recognized and..... more political.
Knowing that so much of my home stomping grounds is going to
remain as I
have always enjoyed it heartens me greatly.
Russ |
Re:
Sweet Taste of Victory/ more work to do |
dbhg-@comcast.net |
Sep
23, 2006 13:14 PDT |
Lee,
Thanks. My involvement to date makes me very
much aware that only the outline of policies exist to handle a
large scale disturbance event. The smaller things like ATV use
have been thought through. No ATVs. Plant harvesting is not
permitted. Hunting is. In the case of the reserve for MTSF, SMSF,
and MSF, there is very little incursion in this area because of
its ruggedness.
Bob
|
Sweet
Taste of Victory/ Starfish Story |
Edward
Frank |
Sep
24, 2006 20:29 PDT |
Bob,
Congratulations on the victory with the designation of portions
of MTSF as part of a MA Large Forest Reserve. That seemed by far
to be the strangest omission from the presentation at last
years Forest Summit. I am sure you will not rest on your laurels
now that this area has received protection, but you a few moment
of respite to savor the victory before your next battle.
There is a story that has been repeated in many contexts that I
though would be appropriate to repeat under these circumstances:
--------------------------------------------------------------
- The
Starfish Story
adapted from The Star Thrower by Loren Eiseley
1907 - 1977
Once upon a time, there was a wise man who used to go to the
ocean to do his writing. He had a habit of walking on the
beach before he began his work.
One day, as he was walking along the shore, he looked down
the beach and saw a human figure moving like a dancer. He
smiled to himself at the thought of someone who would dance
to the day, and so, he walked faster to catch up.
As he got closer, he noticed that the figure was that of a
young man, and that what he was doing was not dancing at
all. The young man was reaching down to the shore, picking
up small objects, and throwing them into the ocean.
He came closer still and called out "Good morning! May
I ask what it is that you are doing?"
The young man paused, looked up, and replied "Throwing
starfish into the ocean."
"I must ask, then, why are you throwing starfish into
the ocean?" asked the somewhat startled wise man.
To this, the young man replied, "The sun is up and the
tide is going out. If I don't throw them in, they'll
die."
Upon hearing this, the wise man commented, "But, young
man, do you not realize that there are miles and miles of
beach and there are starfish all along every mile? You can't
possibly make a difference!"
At this, the young man bent down, picked up yet another
starfish, and threw it into the ocean. As it met the water,
he said, "It made a difference for that one."
This story has appeared all over the web in various forms,
usually with no credit given to Mr. Eiseley. Sometimes it is
a little girl throwing the starfish into the ocean,
sometimes a young man, once even an elderly Indian. In any
form it is a beautiful story and one that makes you think.
Loren Eiseley was a anthropologist who wrote extensively. He
was the 'wise man' in the story, and he was walking along a
beach after a storm and encountered the fellow throwing the
starfish back.
http://muttcats.com/starfish.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Bob, it seems you made a difference for this one.
Ed Frank
|
|