Robinson
- Persistence Pays Off |
Robert
Leverett |
Nov
20, 2006 08:11 PST |
ENTS,
On Sunday, Monica, Gary Beluzo, and Steve
Tilley went back to
Robinson SP and revisited a ravine with tall tuliptrees. With a
much
clearer view of the canopy, we needed to make a last effort to
confirm
the heights if the tulips there. We circled around to the other
side of
the 70-foot deep ravine, took indecisive measurements and
returned to
the near side. We got measurements of 138.0 to 139.7 taken by
either
Gary or myself. These measurements were across the highest twigs
that
were 51 to 52 yards distant. Those distances along with the
angles
basal measurements led to the heights, just below 140. Then I
zeroed in
on a distant-appearing twig and got 52.5 yards. I waited,
repeated the
distance measurement, waited and repeated a third time. The
distance
with the angle and the basal measurement led to 140.3 feet.
However, at
the abse, I shot to the lower side of the trunk. Adjusting more
to
mid-slope, I got 140.0 feet. So the tulip enters the list of
Massachusetts species confirmed to 140 or more feet in height.
White
pine, white ash, and tuliptree are the three.
This morning Ray Weber of Friends of Robinson
SP confirmed that there
is another tuliptree ravine in Robinson. Obviously, we will
investigate
it at the first opportunity. Other measurements of Robinson
trees were
largely refinements of prior measurements. Robinson's RHI now
stands at
118.2.
Bob
|
Questions
for Lee |
Robert
Leverett |
Nov
20, 2006 09:44 PST |
Lee,
I am curious as to what your thoughts are about Robinson State
Park in
terms of probable ecological trajectories? I know you saw enough
red
maple saplings to suggest its growth as a percentage of total
stems in
the future.
DCR seems to think that the trees in the even-aged areas of
Robinson's
forests are either going to die together to create a scene of
standing
dead snags or the trees are all blow down together. I find
either
scenario unlikely. Small wind events and individual tree
mortality is
what I would predict - except where insect infestations trump
the
slower, more deliberate processes.
Care to make any predictions based on what you
saw?
Bob
|
Re:
Questions for Lee |
Lee
E. Frelich |
Nov
21, 2006 07:56 PST |
Bob:
Except for the red pine stand, and except for the 0.001 annual
probability
of a large-scale blowdown, you are correct, the trees in
even-aged stands
will die over a period of several decades, gradually making a
transition to
an uneven-aged forest.
Red maple is still in relatively early stages of invasion. You
have the
choice of limiting it by prescribed fire or mechanically, or
letting it
take over, which will take several decades.
If I were you I would advocate a program of exotic species
removal,
especially Norway maple. You can probably get volunteers to do
most of the
exotic removal work, although you need a forester who is into
education and
supervision of local people. Ditto for Ice
Glen. Norway maple there has
not gotten to the explosion point yet, but it will soon.
Lee
|
Re:
Questions for Lee |
Gary
A. Beluzo |
Nov
21, 2006 08:17 PST |
Lee:
When you speak of the red maple "taking over" what
does this mean from an
ecological standpoint? Also, if left alone (no further
anthropogenic
meddling) how long would it take for a presettement tree species
composition
to reappear, or could it?
I am wondering if left to natural processes (return to
autopoiesis) whether
or not we could expect the larger contiguous forests in MA to
revert back to
a pre-settlement forest, or if the current "state of the
system" would make
that trajectory unlikely and something "new" would
result? Are there
previously clearly European forests that have reverted back to a
true
pre-settlement state? I am trying to think of forests somewhere
in the
world that were disturbed by humans long enough ago (and then
left to go
natural again) to look at as examples.
Gary
|
Re:
Questions for Lee |
Lee
E. Frelich |
Nov
21, 2006 10:04 PST |
Gary:
Red maple taking over means it becoming the dominant species
because it is
moderately shade-tolerant, produces a lot of seed, and can grow
on all
types of soils. Its dominance would last until something more
shade-tolerant replaced it, such as sugar maple, hemlock or
Norway maple,
although on poor sandy soils it might form a climax in the
absence of fire.
I don't think the forest in MA would ever return to their
presettlement
state. Their landscape context and disturbance frequencies are
different,
and the climate is different now than when the previous forest
developed.
Although you consider them larger, they are pretty small
fragments of the
former forest.
We don't know if European forests have returned to a true
presettlement
state, since we don't have enough information on what the
presettlement
state was. However, I doubt it because dominance by humans
occurred along
with climate change that would also have changed the forests in
the absence
of people.
Lee
|
|