More modeling   Robert Leverett
  Oct 03, 2005 10:25 PDT 

ENTS:

   Over the weekend I modeled the Joseph Brant pine to 653 cubes,
remodeled the Jani tree to 472 cubes, and remodeled the Jake Swamp tree
for the 3rd time. The composite model yields 605 cubes for Jake.

   To date, 19 trees have been modeled. Several have been modeled twice
and one has been modeled 3 times. The following table summarizes the
results.

Name            Height    CBH    Volume    CBH-50'
Grandfather    145.3    13.8       1041      40.6
Ice Glen         154.3    13.0       1033      39.1
Grandmother   150.8    13.8        928       36.5
Hiawatha        141.8    12.5        883       26.8
Tecumseh       161.3    11.7        878       37.5
Thoreau          160.2    12.6       864
Joseph Brant    156.2    11.2       653       30.0
Saheda           164.3    11.4       620       30.5
Jake Swamp    167.3     10.4       605       31.5
McDowell         141.0    12.8       586       28.0
L. Hiawatha      141.9    10.2       583       20.0
Ed Perle           125.4    10.4       552       28.8
Frank Decontie 160.1     10.1       489       28.9
Clutter            152.4     10.6       481       26.3
Jani                150.0     10.8       472       27.3
Joe Norton Tree 164.2     9.7       415       23.0


   The above table standardizes the limb volume to 7% of the trunk
volume, which will do until more data is gathered.
The Tecumseh tree needs remodeling as does the Grandfather tree.
tecumseh's volume is almost certainly overstated by between 100 and 200
cubes. The method of modeling was mixed. I expect teh Grandfather tree

    The lesson learned so far is that multiple modelings from different
distances can reveal suspect measurements. A composite volume modeling
can be developed from the separate modelings to include the most
reliable measurements. In time I hope to home in on diameters at heights
of 2, 4.5, 6, 15, 25, 50, 75, and 100 feet. Maybe a regression-based
model can be developed that will explain 90% or more of the volume
variation. If so, this would allow a user of the RD 1000 to concentrate
on getting accurate measurements at those heights. The first 3 would be
with D-tape. That leaves 5 measurements with the RD 1000 with 3
independent measurements at each height. That's a total of 18 total
measurements.

    The primary impediment to this following a set protocal is
visibility. A lot of time can be spent roaming around finding locations.


Bob

Robert T. Leverett
Cofounder, Eastern Native Tree Society