A Walk through Patapsco... (MD)   Matthew Hannum
  May 22, 2006 16:12 PDT 

Greetings!

I took advantage of the nice weather this weekend and hiked along one of
the many interesting trails in Patapsco State Park that is "off the
beaten path". This was the Rockburn Branch Trail, one that supposedly
goes through a mature forest (which it did).

huge_tree2.jpg (70854 bytes)

This photo was taken much deeper in the park,
along the Rockburn Branch stream. Here, there are trees that seem
considerably older mixed in with the more common young to mature trees in
the park. This tulip poplar is an example. Note the gnarled root buttress
that, at least to me, seems to indicate greater that average age. The
understory has its usual heavy population of shade tolerate beech trees in
this area of the park, despite its proximity to a stream.



Anyway, I was mostly there to have fun and enjoy the park, but I did try
my hand at measuring some of the larger trees... and I really don't know
how you folks do it so successfully!

Girth: This can be tricky depending upon what plants live under the
tree, and plenty of trees had vines on them... I don't recall if poison
ivy or Virginia creeper is the fuzzy-stalked one, so I just avoided them
both. Also, it works a lot better with 2 people to hole the tape measure
in place.

Height: This is the real puzzle - how does one measure the height of a
tree when it seems the only way to see the top is to stand under it? I
know that clinometers tend to give questionable results, but in a dense
forest, I can't see any good way of measuring tree height without using
a laser rangefinder to try to hit a high branch (and even that is
tricky)

ID: Even this posed challenging. Some stuff was obvious, but plenty of
trees couldn't be narrowed down to anymore than a family or one of
several choices. It is tricky when the nearest leaf is 40-feet up!

Anyway, I still had fun and so I'll write about what I saw. Sorry for a
lack of any real numbers:

big_tulip2.jpg (81030 bytes)

An example of a mature tulip poplar in the highlands of
Patapsco State Park - the photo was taken in the same general area as the
one of the beech tree, on the road leading to the Ridge Road and Rockburn
Branch trails. These tulips poplars, while definitely second-growth, have
achieved respectable height and girth, though they are still young when
compared to the maximum age and size of the species.



- Tulip Trees: These huge trees pretty much rule all of Patapsco State
Park, at least all the parts I've seen. Rare is the place where they are
not the tallest and most massive tree. I saw plenty of trees that were
over 3-feet in diameter, and I'd guess that they were over 100-feet
tall. Tulip Trees are common in both the uplands and the lowlands,
though they sometimes tip over in the lowlands when the winds pick up
and the soil is too soft. Hurricanes produce this effect, and when one
goes down, it may take out its neighbors, too.

- Sycamores (American Sycamore): This species is confined to the
lowlands, where it grows to monstrous size, beating out the tulip trees
in diameter, though I'd say that it only comes in second in height, on
average. Still, sycamores that are 3 to 4 feet in diameter and over
100-feet tall live in the lowlands, so these fellas are BIG.

big_beech2.jpg (84230 bytes)

An example of a mature beech tree in the highlands of
Patapsco State Park. These trees can reach a respectable size (3+ feet in
diameter), though they are generally not the largest tree in any given area.


- American Beech: This species mostly populated the upper areas of the
park, where seedlings and young trees could be found in abundance. There
were some older trees as well, though truly big beech trees are not very
common. I did see one by a path that had the year "1956" carved into it.
Assuming that the year was accurate and the tree was of decent size
then, it might be around 80+ years of age now. No sign of beech-bark
disease, and I shudder to think what it would do to this park since
American Beech seems to be the primary shade-tolerant species in the
higher areas. Good size beech trees get over 3-feet in diameter, but
they are not that big compared to the tulip trees and sycamores.

ridge_trail2.jpg (81597 bytes)

This tree guards the path to the Ridge Road Trail and is
a good example of the old, gnarled oaks that can be found scattered here and
there through Patapsco. I haven't found any areas of high oak density yet,
but they seem to be everywhere in low numbers, and now and then one will run
into a truly magnificent and gnarled tree, such as this one. The photo
serves to give some scale to the tree; I am pretty sure it's massive,
buttressed trunk was over 4-feet in diameter, though it was tricky to
measure. I don't know what variety of oak it was (all the leaves were way
too high up to be sure), but it was definitely something from the red oak
family, and I think Northern Red oak was a close match.

- Oaks (of all kinds): I haven't found too many dense areas of oaks, but
small to mid-sizes ones are found here and there, as are some down-right
HUGE older trees. One beast on the way up the trail had a diameter of
about 4-feet or more, with a heavily fluted (but not really flared)
base. It split into two big leaders maybe 15 to 20 feet up. This big
tree was some variety of red oak - the leaves looked to be related to
pin, scarlet, or maybe shumard oak. A few other monster oaks I've seen
lurking in the park of mixed kinds (reds, whites, etc.)

- Ash (green): I found at least one nice sized green ash on the way up.
Not too big - nothing compared to the really astounding trees, but it
was still of good size (maybe 2 to 3 feet diameter, 90+ feet high, I
guess).

- Maples and Box Elders: Confined to the lowland sites, the park really
doesn't seem to have too many maples, at least not the areas I've seen.
Box Elders are reasonably common of this group, as are silver maples.
I've seen a few other types of maples, but not many at all. There are
some good sized silver maples in the lowlands, but winds and floods tend
to ruin them.

- Hickories and Walnuts: I've located a few hickories, and I think they
are pignuts or mockernuts. Supposedly, the park has shagbark hickories,
but I haven't seen one yet. I've also found black walnuts on the ground
(without the husk), but I haven't located the trees. No area that I've
seen has a high concentration of any of these trees, but they seem to
crop up everywhere, even in lowland areas. None of these trees have
reached a very impressive size, and one could walk right past them
without appreciating them if one misses the tell-tale nuts on the forest
floor.

- Black Locust: This species is growing harder and harder to find in the
park since it is shade intolerant and short-lived. I found a few clumps
yesterday in the higher elevations, but all the trees were dead, dying,
or sick. Most were stricken with that heart-rot fungus that produces
those brown conks on the trunk.

- Elms (Unknown type, but not American): This was a puzzler, but I think
I've found a few elms in the park: alternate, saw-toothed oval leaves,
and the bark and growth seems to match up with some possibilities...
more research is needed.

- Lindens / Basswoods: These lurk in the park here and there, given away
by their leaves and bark. However, they grow to such a height that the
flowers are not obvious until they fall, much like tulip trees.

As for other things of note:

- Invasive: Garlic Muster sadly lurks in the park, creeping here, there,
and everywhere. It is by far the worst in the lowlands and most heavily
disturbed areas, but one can find it in small amounts in other places. I
also know of one area where a wisteria is causing problems, and I saw a
few trees of heaven lurking near the park entrance. Deep in the woods,
the situation is much better, at least to my untrained eye - I am no
expert in this matter, but there are a few pests I can recognize.

- Weird, ghostly, dead evergreens: I ran into a few of these deep in the
park. They were modest sized trees in a small group and were all dead
with no needles on them. I have no idea what species they were;
supposedly the park has some hemlocks in it, so I wondered if I was
witnessing the work of the Hemlock Wooly Aldegid, but I really don't
know... it just gave me something to think about.

So, for whatever it is worth, this is my write up on what I saw from the
perspective of a guy who loves trees and the forest even if he's not
very good at measuring trees.

Enjoy!

RE: Hello!   Edward Frank
  May 17, 2006 17:51 PDT 

Matthew,

Welcome to ENTS. Many of our best tree producing sites, in terms of
height are not in old growth, but older second growth forests. For me
personally, I am particularly interested in patches of old growth, but
forested areas of any age are worthwhile. I looked for information on
Patapsco State Park on the internet and found this blurb (on multiple
sites):

"Patapsco Valley State Park is Maryland's oldest, dating from the
creation of the Patapsco Forest Preserve in 1907 with a donation of 43
acres by John Glenn. At that time, much of this valley known as "the
river of history" had been denuded of trees in support of agriculture
and various industries over the years. With additional donations and
purchases over the years, the park now encompasses about 15,000 acres
and well-established second-growth forests."

The are a actually didn't become a state park until 1937, but in 1907 it
was designated a Forest Preserve. This implies to me that the 43 acres
donated at that time were forested - I am not sure how old the trees
were at that time, whether they were primary forest or second growth,
but that was 100 years ago. If sections of this original tract were not
harvested since 1907 (maybe they were), there may be a patch of old
growth or some pretty mature second growth by now. It would be
worthwhile looking into the next time you are there - find out where the
original section of the park, see what the trees look like.

Ed Frank


  Matthew Hannum wrote:

I live in Maryland now, and Patapsco State Park is one of my favorite
haunts. I doubt there's any old growth there, but it sure has some big,
second growth trees.
RE: A walk through Patapsco... VA CREEPER   Will Blozan
  May 23, 2006

Matthew,

Excellent report! I grew up in Rockville and Darnestown and am very fond of
the forests in your area. You need to meet up with Darian Copiz- he is
living in DC and an excellent dendromorphometrist! He is a member of this
list. Good luck!

VA creeper does not have the black woolly hairs along the stem as poison ivy
does. Incidentally, I found VA creeper at 130.5' up in a hemlock I climbed
last week!

Will

-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Frank 
Matthew,

Excellent report. I look forward to reading more of them. Poison Ivy has
clusters of three leaves, while Virginia Creeper has five leaves.

Ed Frank