The
Senator Cypress is re-elected to top position in Eastern Forests |
Will
Blozan |
May
08, 2006 09:54 PDT |
ENTS,
A recent trip to Florida allowed a trip to see the famous
"Senator Cypress"
in Longwood, Florida, northeast of Orlando. The tree is
preserved in a tiny
park simply named "Big Tree Park". It has the
indignity of being caught up
in a dispute of whether it is in fact the largest baldcypress
known in the
U.S., specifically its rank on the American Forests National
Register of Big
Trees. A heated and (unprofessional) debate between the
nominators of the
Cat Island Cypress in Louisiana (the current National Champion)
and the
Florida Big Tree Register has made its appearance on the
internet and in
numerous newspapers. Basically, the Cat Island Cypress is a huge
flared
"turnip" with a hugely inflated girth due to
buttressing. Furthermore, it is
a fusion of two genetically identical sprouts of moderate size,
and as so
does not represent a single-trunked tree. In extreme contrast to
the shape
and size of the Cat Island tree, the Senator is an absolutely
HUGE
single-trunked tree with a massive trunk of slow taper and
impressive
straightness. It looks more like the giant conifers of the
Pacific
Northwest, evoking images of western red cedar.
old Postcard
American Forests will resolve big tree disputes if accurate
volume
measurements can verify that one contending specimen is larger
than the
other. This has been employed in the case of the huge sequoias
and Sitka
spruce and perhaps a few other species. In fact, I was asked a
few years ago
to visit and measure both cypress trees (via climbing) to
determine the
"winner". I refused due to the obvious fact that the
Cat Island tree was a
twin, and the Senator was so vastly larger. I think American
Forests put up
a vote instead and the Cat Island tree won.
I had seen quotes of some volume estimates of the Senator and
set out on an
online search for some numbers and more specifically, the
methods used. I
found many different numbers listed ranging from ~3600 ft3 to
4217 ft3. Some
were apparently just for the trunk below branching. I found no
reference to
a climber taking aerial measurements even though it has been
climbed many
times. In fact, one of my former employees climbed it for
cuttings for the
Champion Tree Project. The only methodology I could find was a
study using a
Spiegel Relaskop. Although this instrument can be very accurate,
the
measurer split the tree up into 16 foot logs to calculate
volume. I
suspected that was not enough resolution to accurately assess
the volume-
certainly not the portions above the trunk- so I returned armed
with the
macroscope.
Since I have personally climbed the two largest known specimens
of live oak
(~5100 ft3) and tuliptree (~4100 ft3) and measured the Webster
Springs
Sycamore (~3150 ft3) I have a good idea of how large 4217 cubic
feet is. As
I did the first time I saw the Senator Cypress, I kept
exclaiming aloud over
and over how HUGE the tree was, and felt strongly that even the
4217 ft3
figure was low. I also found that a boardwalk and deck had been
built near
the tree and extended to the neighboring tree. The neighboring
tree,
formerly known as the "Senators Brother" was renamed
"Lady Liberty" last
year after it apparently changed sex ;) The board walk provided
a level
reference for all the trunk measurements and a clear line of
site in
opposing 90 degree locations. It was a dream come true! However,
the dream
had its downside- walking visitors shook the macroscope and the
trunk was so
huge that it extended past the reticle scale! Because the
subtropical growth
just off the boardwalk was so thick and blocked a clear view, I
had to stay
put and "split" the scale readings based on a common
reference point on the
trunk. This worked fine and I cross checked the readings when I
returned
home by replicating the distance and scale reading. (Actually,
the
"splitting of the scale tends to slightly underestimate the
width, but I
used the actual calculated width in the subsequent volume
calculations.)
Since I was able to measure the tree from adjacent sides I could
ascertain
the potential for an elliptical shape of the trunk. It turns out
that the
lower trunk was quite round but the upper section before
branching was
fairly elliptical. I replicated measurements at specific heights
and entered
the widths into an elliptical area calculator formula and
converted the area
to circumference for the volume estimations. Before I did that I
cross
checked my baseline distances to check my accuracy with the
laser. I was
thoroughly impressed that the calculated horizontal distances
were within
1.8 feet of each other from the east side and spanned an arching
2.6 feet
from the south side. This confirmed the obvious straight
projection of the
trunk in one direction and the gentle curve in the other. For
this reason, I
feel the measurements are very accurate and exactly reflect the
observed
characteristics of the tree. The tight readings also indicate
the roundness
of the tree trunk. I also remeasured the total height to 113.7',
which is
identical to the reading I got from another vantage point three
years ago on
my first visit.
The Senator is a huge tree, but has a short trunk capped by a
twisted mass
of gnarly limbs. The highest point I was able to measure for
volume was 96.4
feet above ground which was 17.3 feet below the highest tip. The
main trunk
has a diameter of 11'3" at 4.5 feet (in sheer coincidence
11'3" is the exact
girth at the 96.4 foot height and the basal diameter is 17.5
feet, almost
the exact distance below the top!). My diameter measurements
were taken
about 10 feet apart or at inflection points. There was
surprisingly little
change between the points hence I felt no need to take more
(i.e. closer)
measurements. Here are the numbers, adjusted for elliptical
equivalents:
Position Diameter Height
Top 0 113.7'
Trunk 3.58' 96.4'
Trunk 6' 84.4'
Trunk 7.09' 75.3'
Trunk 6.96' 64.9'
Trunk 7.63' 54.1'
Trunk 8.18' 43.3'
Trunk 8.74' 23.6'
Trunk 9.38' 12.4'
Trunk 11.27' 4.5'
Base 17.5' 0'
These numbers, without limb volume, yield a whopping
displacement volume of
5175.3 ft3, surpassing the Middleton Oak as the largest eastern
tree. I
believe this estimate contains over 97% of the tree, since the
cantilevered
limbs will hardly add much volume to the trunk figure. There is
a
substantial reiteration on the north side that would bring the
volume up to
over 5200 ft3. All parts considered I would say the tree scales
around 5300
cubic feet, which is likely more than twice that of the Cat
Island Cypress.
The Cat Island Cypress has a girth of 53'7", or 17'
diameter at 4.5 feet.
Due to the extreme buttress flaring, the functional diameter of
this portion
is far less, perhaps as low as 8 feet in "diameter".
Most of the space
encompassed by the girth measurement is air whereas the Senator
is ALL wood.
Using a conic frustum formula based on the estimated figures
below, this
likely overstated scenario would scale the 83' tall Cat Island
Cypress to
2028 cubic feet.
Diameter Height
0' 83'
2' 60'
4' 40'
6' 20'
8' 4.5'
10' 0'
Based on these estimations, the Senator Cypress is obviously far
larger. I
would love to visit the Cat Island Cypress and perform a basal
footprint and
trunk profile map to calculate the volume of the twin tree.
There are likely
hundreds of baldcypress trees larger in volume than the Cat
Island Cypress
scattered throughout the U.S., including the "Lady
Liberty" adjacent to the
Senator. Curiously, in a survey of the largest baldcypress in
Florida, the
"Lady Liberty" was not considered whereas the other
trees measured were
quite a bit smaller in volume than what I would estimate the
"Lady Liberty"
tree to be.
I hereby cast my vote for the Senator Cypress to be the reigning
National
Champion!
Here is a website concerning the tree with links to others:
http://www.championtrees.org/champions/volume.htm
Will Blozan
|
RE:
The Senator Cypress is re-elected to top position in Eastern
Forests |
James
Smith |
May
08, 2006 19:01 PDT |
I have been to see that tree several times. It always floors me.
It's
good to hear that it is, indeed, the largest Eastern tree.
When I was a kid my dad and I went to see the tree with a fellow
from
the Audobon Society. This was my first time seeing the tree and
would
have been around 1970 or so. Even then, the guy from Audobon
insisted
that the Senator was the largest tree on the East Coast.
Nice to know the old guy was right.
PS: The last time I went to see the tree we had to beat a hasty
retreat
as we were being eaten alive by swarms of mosquitoes. I recall
that my
arms looked absolutely hairy with them. No wonder we were the
only ones
there that day! |
Re:
The Senator Cypress is re-elected to top position in Eastern
Forests |
abi-@u.washington.edu |
May
08, 2006 21:18 PDT |
Will,
Great to hear of your report. This is the first detailed
assessment that I trust from this tree. It is also good to see
that my measurements do not differ from yours very much for the
first 25 feet and total tree height.
However, the upper measurements differ a bit - with mine being
consistantly smaller for the upper stem. My number of 4,215
cubic feet was based in part on photographic techniques for the
upper stem (since I did not have the Criterion 400 with me at
the time), but also based in part of my judgement of the trees
'roundness'.
I saw fluting and concavities all the way up the stem, so my
diameter measurements were trimmed a bit to take this into
account.
While my measurements may be a bit low, yours may be a bit high.
Even if you take measurements from different angles and use the
elliptical formula for the frustums, this still does not account
for concavities. I have climbed and measured many trees in the
Cupressaceae, and find that these concavities cannot be ignored
- they are too substantial.
Regardless, this tree has no peer within the other large Bald
Cypress trees, certainly the Cat Island tree which is two
smallish trees sharing a huge, common base. However, I would
like to hear more about about how you dealt with the fluting and
concavities before we proclaim this tree larger than the
Middleton Oak.
Cheers,
- BVP |
RE:
The Senator Cypress is re-elected to top position in Eastern
Forests |
Will
Blozan |
May
09, 2006 08:35 PDT |
BVP,
True, the tree had some concavities, but not so much that I felt
major
adjustments were needed. I am probably wrong on this, but since
diameters
were blended the concavities may have either been taken into
account or if
the diameters taken were on "ridges" then it would be
overstated. I will
send some photos of the tree to Ed, and for a cypress, the trunk
is to me
very round for the species. A climb would be the best
alternative but the
trunk shape would still be a bear to figure out. However, I
fully trust the
reticle measurements and a more comprehensive sampling in the
winter with
(hopefully) better sightings from more locations would be the
next best
option other than climbing.
How can you do a photo analysis and adjust for scale, distance,
distortion,
etc.? Did you take the photos?
Will
|
Re:
The Senator Cypress is re-elected to top position in Eastern
Forests |
abi-@u.washington.edu |
May
09, 2006 10:35 PDT |
Greetings,
No one is arguing that the Cat Island tree is not one genetic
individual. There are plenty of double and triple trees that are
one genetic individual that ENTS has been sucessful at removing
from big tree lists. There are whole groves of coast redwoods
that are one genetic individual, for that matter.
Trees with single stems do matter.
Will - I took three tape wraps at three different heights near
the base of the Senator and got nearly what you did - except for
the ground measurement. My zero reading is considerably smaller
than yours, as I was trying to take into account all of the
fluting.
Cheers,
- BVP |
RE:
The Senator Cypress is re-elected to top position in Eastern
Forests |
Robert
Leverett |
May
09, 2006 12:19 PDT |
Bob,
Reference your point that "Trees with single stems do
matter."
I assume that you are not concerned with whether or not a tree
branches a few feet above its base, just that it start off as
single
stem. Am I interpreting you correctly? No fused trunks, right?
Bob
|
Re:
The Senator Cypress is re-elected to top position in Eastern
Forests |
Edward
Frank |
May
09, 2006 14:23 PDT |
Bob and Will,
If the pattern of pockets and ridges around the perimeter were
significant
in terms of the effective diameter of the tree, there are some
approximations that can be made. Consider that connecting the
low points in
the circumference (concavity) would generate a minimum diameter
for the
tree. Connecting the high points (the fluting) would generate
the maximum
diameter for the tree. I won't consider how elliptical the tree
is for this
discussion. if the valleys and ridges of the circumference were
regular and
symmetrical around the mid-point between the high points and the
low points
of the circumference (the 1/2 wave length for the fluted side
would be equal
in length to the 1/2 wave for the concavity, like a sine wave
going around
the tree) then the effective diameter of the tree would be
almost exactly
equal to the diameter of the tree measured at this mid point
(minimum
diameter + maximum diameter/2). You can't really measure the minimum
diameter, but the 1/2 wave lengths for the high side and low
side could be
measured - There would be some variation depending on the concave
or convex
shape of each portion - but approximately if the 1/2 wave
lengths were the
same, then the negative volume for the concave section would be
equal to the
positive volume of the convex bulging section. therefore the
effective
diameter would be equal to the maximum diameter - 1/2 depth of
the
concavity.
If the the ratio of the lengths of the convex bulge and the
concave hollow
were examined. If the ratio is 1:1 then they are equal as above.
As the
ratio of 1/2 wavelength of the outer bulge increases with
respect to the
concavity, then the effective diameter increasingly approaches
the maximum
diameter. This would be the case if there was a tree with
relatively narrow
deep notches in it. As the ratio of the concave portion would
increase with
respect to the bulge, the effective diameter would approach the
minimum
diameter. An example of this would be a tree with narrow ridges
sticking
out from it like may be seen in some buttresses.
This doesn't give you a specific number or formula to calculate
the
effective diameter, but does establish some minimums, maximums,
and
guidelines to suggest where where in the range between the two
extremes the
effective diameter should be estimated.
Ed Frank
|
RE:
The Senator Cypress is re-elected to top position in Eastern
Forests |
Will
Blozan |
May
09, 2006 15:00 PDT |
BVP, I was unable to access the base so I used the most recent
measurements.
I would like to plug your numbers in to complete the
calculations.
Thanks!
Will
|
RE:
The Senator Cypress is re-elected to top position in Eastern
Forests |
abi-@u.washington.edu |
May
10, 2006 11:08 PDT |
Will,
My basal numbers include data from three tape wraps and my
interpretation of the portion near the ground. Using these the
tree drop in volume a bit to just over 5K.
Cheers,
- BVP
HT Diam
0 16.00
1.75 13.77
3 11.86
4.5 11.27
6.5 10.13
|
|