Tallest
hardwood? |
abi-@u.washington.edu |
May
10, 2006 11:25 PDT |
Greetings,
I just returned from some fieldwork and went to remeasure the
Lewis River cottonwood in Southern Washington. The tree has two
different sprigs that pop above 179 feet, with the tallest being
179.6!
Since this is just May, and both leaders are thrifty, it seems
likely that one or both of the leaders will be over 180 feet by
September, making this, I believe, THE TALLEST NATIVE HARDWOOD
IN NORTH AMERICA!!
Cheers,
- BVP |
RE:
Tallest hardwood? |
Robert
Leverett |
May
12, 2006 05:54 PDT |
Will and Bob,
It would be interesting to compare the density
of the tall
cottonwoods in a few stands where there is one or more very tall
ones to
the density of tall tuliptrees in a few stands where there is
one or
more very tall tuliptrees, e.g. the best against the best to get
a
better idea about averages and probabilities. Given stands of
tuliptrees
and cottonwoods on comparably good growing sites for the two
species and
sufficient age on the stands, are we likely to find the stand
height
average to be greater for the cottonwood or the tuliptree?
We now know that there are many places in the
East where tuliptrees
break 150 feet. In fact, it has become clear that the tuliptree
has more
trees in the 150 and above height class, by far, than any other
eastern
species including the lordly white pine. Above 150, the tulips
snake
their way into the 160s in the middle and southern latitudes and
then
the species height curve takes a sharp dive. Based on what we're
seeing
from our ENTS measurements, a very small fraction make it into
the 170s,
but so far none have been confirmed in the 180s - although there
is
little doubt in my mind that a few have done it historically. I
suspect
that the high 180s represents the absolute best that the species
can do.
But back to the contest. In choosing the
tallest hardwood in the
U.S., do we go with the species with the single tallest
individual or do
we go with some kind of average or statistical distribution? I
assume
there is a scattering of the pacific cost cottonwoods that are
in the
170s and many in the 150s. Is that true Bob? Will, the gauntlet
has been
thrown down. We gotta find a 180-foot tulip this summer.
Bob
|
RE:
Tallest hardwood? |
abi-@u.washington.edu |
May
12, 2006 18:36 PDT |
Bob and Will,
Open-grown cottonwoods over 150 feet tall are fairly easy to
find.
Forest grown cottonwoods over 165 feet tall are super common,
yet I have only measured 7 trees over 175 feet tall.
From my observations from ground-based and within-tree surveys
(I have spent several days on rope in giant cottonwoods), there
is a continual breakage of thumbsized twigs that goes on in the
crowns of these trees. Like many Salix species, the last set of
twigs before the leaves are brittle and snap off with the
slightest pressure.
With these record height trees, this is probably in part due to
some relationship with moisture stress, but is a feature of the
trees in general.
My guess would be that your second-growth Liriodendrons that are
over 170 feet tall have a better chance of reaching 190 feet
than any of the Populus I am familiar with.
Cheers,
- BVP |
RE:
Tallest hardwood? |
abi-@u.washington.edu |
May
14, 2006 10:06 PDT |
Greetings,
To keep things in perspective, here is an interesting recent
development.
One of my close associates, who works with me quite a bit and is
quite good with tree measurements, was working on Catalina
Island in southern California and measured some trees in a grove
of Eucalyptus globulus. He measured several trees over 230 feet
tall, with one just over 239 feet!
These trees have their roots in a stream drainage, and have
sunny weather nearly every day of the year. These are easily the
tallest Angiosperm trees in the Western Hemisphere! They are
also not even 100 years old!
That is the good news. All of these trees are scheduled for
removal because the island is trying to restore native
ecosystems by removing non-native vegetation.
We will certainly try to obtain some canopy-level info before
their demise, but I am not sure if we have any recourse in
trying to save these extremely significant trees.
D'oh!
- BVP |
|